Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34550448›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2021

[Fertility preservation options before gonadotoxic antirheumatic treatment : A review].

Philippos Edimiris, Jan-Steffen Krüssel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philippos EdimirisUniversitäres Interdisziplinäres Kinderwunschzentrum Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. Edimiris@unikid.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9135-196X
Jan-Steffen KrüsselUniversitäres Interdisziplinäres Kinderwunschzentrum Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclophosphamide is still clinically used in rheumatic diseases with severe disease courses. Cyclophosphamide has a pronounced gonadotoxic effect largely depending on the cumulative dose. The risk of amenorrhea is reported to be in the range of 12-54% and is dependent on the age of the patient at initiation of treatment. Every patient of reproductive age should therefore be offered counseling on options for fertility protection. There are 3 options for fertility protection: oocyte harvesting and cryopreservation after a hormonal stimulation of 10-14 days, ovarian wedge resection and cryopreservation and administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. The decision whether and, if so, which treatment should be performed is made in close consultation between the patient, rheumatologists and reproductive physicians and depends on the available treatment time window, the age of the patient and the severity of the underlying disease.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationCryopreservationCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansOocytesOvaryCyclophosphamideAmenorrheaCyclophosphamideFertility protectionOvarian cryopreservationRheumatic diseases

Identifiers

PMID34550448
OpenAlexW3199808072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.