Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34550446›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

The role of gender-specific factors in the choice of specialty training in obstetrics and gynecology: results from a survey among medical students in Germany.

Maximilian Riedel, André Hennigs, Anna Maria Dobberkau, Caroline Riedel, Till Johannes Bugaj, Christoph Nikendei, Niklas Amann, Anne Karge, Gabriel Eisenkolb, Maria Tensil and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maximilian RiedelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
André HennigsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna Maria DobberkauDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Caroline RiedelDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Till Johannes BugajDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph NikendeiDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Niklas AmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Anne KargeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gabriel EisenkolbDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maria TensilKirinus Clinic for Psychotherapy, Munich, Germany.
Florian ReckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bonn University Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
Fabian RiedelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. fabian.riedel@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe field of obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) is facing growing competition for young professionals in Germany, with high interest rates among female graduates and a declining proportion of male students who choose residency training in the field. The aim of this study is to analyze general and gender-dependent factors that influence the decision for or against specialty training in OB/GYN among medical students in Germany.

methodsBetween February and November 2019, n = 346 medical students in their 5th and 6th year of undergraduate training at Heidelberg University received a questionnaire with 44 items.

resultsn = 286 students (61.3 female; 38.7% male) participated in the study. 28% of the female students and 9% of the male students had considered OB/GYN for their specialty training. The students reported different general and gender-specific influencing factors in their choice of a specialty. Both genders desired a good work-life-balance, however, in comparison with their female colleagues, male students had heavily weighted factors related to their later careers and professional success, including competition among colleagues. Male students had gained little practical experience during compulsory internships (26.9% for females vs. 8.8% for males) or had chosen their final-year elective in OB/GYN (15.9% for females vs. 5.5% for males). Female students had worried about the negative effects of their sex on their career (35.4% for females vs. 5.9% for males).

conclusionOB/GYN must become more appealing and attractive to young female and male professionals alike. A better compatibility of career and family should go hand in hand with the implementation of differentiated, (extra) curricular teaching approaches that take the different preferences of female and male students into account.

Indexed as

GynecologyInternship and ResidencyObstetricsStudents, MedicalFemaleGermanyHumansMalePregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesGenderMedical teachingObstetrics and gynecologySpecialty trainingStudents

Identifiers

PMID34550446
PMCPMC8782790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.