Trial reportBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021
[Unplanned pregnancy-now what? : Effectiveness and acceptance of medical teaching units for primary and secondary prevention in schools].
Trial report in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe German Medical Society for Health Promotion (ÄGGF) has developed a school-based teaching unit for students in grade 8 and higher that aims at primary and secondary prevention of unplanned pregnancies.
aimsThe accompanying evaluation study analyzes the effects of the teaching unit on the students' knowledge and their experience with self-efficacy concerning unplanned pregnancies.
methodsA two-armed cluster-randomized controlled study was conducted using a ten-page anonymous questionnaire with a closed answer format before and after the intervention.
resultsIn the first survey, 1855 students participated; 1523 students participated in the second. Participants in the intervention group showed a greater increase in knowledge over time. Compared to the control group, they showed an increased intention to use the pill and condoms as well as a marked increase in self-efficacy in the case of an unplanned pregnancy. Furthermore, they significantly corrected their perception of the age at which same-aged boys start having sexual intercourse. All effects remained stable when covariates were controlled. The teaching units were highly accepted: more than 90% of the participants stated that they would recommend them to other students. DISCUSSION: A school-based medical teaching unit about the prevention of unplanned teenage pregnancies was able to contribute to the improvement of students' knowledge and competency. The intervention itself was highly accepted within the target group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34550413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.