Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34549884›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2022

In vivo efficacy of 3D-printed elastin-gelatin-hyaluronic acid scaffolds for regeneration of nasal septal cartilage defects.

Abbas Shokri, Kousar Ramezani, Mohammad Reza Jamalpour, Chiman Mohammadi, Farshid Vahdatinia, Amin Doosti Irani, Esmaeel Sharifi, Rasool Haddadi, Shokoofeh Jamshidi, Leila Mohammadi Amirabad and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abbas ShokriDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Implants Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Kousar RamezaniDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5416-5271
Mohammad Reza JamalpourDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Implants Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Chiman MohammadiResearch Center for Molecular Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Farshid VahdatiniaDental Implant Research Center, Dental School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Amin Doosti IraniDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Esmaeel SharifiDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Rasool HaddadiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Shokoofeh JamshidiDental Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Leila Mohammadi AmirabadMarquette University, School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Sanaz TajikMarquette University, School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Amir YadegariMarquette University, School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Lobat TayebiMarquette University, School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IRMarquette University · US

Funding

Supplement: Development of an Integrated 3D Human Osteo-Mucosal ModelR15DE027533 · NIDCR · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYEBI, LOBAT · 2018 to 2021
$816k
NIDCR NIH HHS R15 DE027533NIDCR NIH HHS R15DE027533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasal septal cartilage perforations occur due to the different pathologies. Limited healing ability of cartilage results in remaining defects and further complications. This study sought to assess the efficacy of elastin-gelatin-hyaluronic acid (EGH) scaffolds for regeneration of nasal septal cartilage defects in rabbits. Defects (4 × 7 mm) were created in the nasal septal cartilage of 24 New Zealand rabbits. They were randomly divided into four groups: Group 1 was the control group with no further intervention, Group 2 received EGH scaffolds implanted in the defects, Group 3 received EGH scaffolds seeded with autologous auricular chondrocytes implanted in the defects, and Group 4 received EGH scaffolds seeded with homologous auricular chondrocytes implanted in the defects. After a 4-month healing period, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained from the nasal septal cartilage, followed by histological evaluations of new tissue formation. Maximum regeneration occurred in Group 2, according to CT, and Group 3, according to both T1 and T2 images with 7.68 ± 1.36, 5.44 ± 2.41, and 8.72 ± 3.02 mm

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularNasal CartilagesAnimalsChondrocytesElastinGelatinHyaluronic AcidPrinting, Three-DimensionalRabbitsRegenerationTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsWound HealingElastinGelatinHyaluronic Acidcartilagenasal septumregenerationtissue scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID34549884
PMCPMC9365017
OpenAlexW3199236347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.