SynthesisJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2021
The influence of POLST on treatment intensity at the end of life: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03007953 (Palliative Care Interventions for Outpatients Newly Diagnosed With Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Palliative Care Interventions for Outpatients Newly Diagnosed With Lung Cancer: Phase II
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Goals of care discussions in hospitalised patients: systematic review of randomised trials.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2026Pooled it
- Part 3: Ethics: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.Circulation · 2025Guideline
- Evaluating outcomes of advance care planning interventions for adults living with advanced illness and people close to them: A systematic meta-review.Palliative medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Dyadic-concordance death-preparedness states and end-of-life care received by cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Obligated To Say "Yes": The How and Why Behind Transfer Decisions in Moribund Patients.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Defining ceilings of treatment in hip fracture patients: prevalence, prognostic value, and the role of orthogeriatric co-management.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Status of Physician-Ordered Advance Code in Patients With Acute Heart Failure.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Factors influencing self-decision in withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments among older patients admitted to general hospital: A retrospective case-control study.Journal of Korean gerontological nursing · 2025Article
- Using the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) in a community setting: does it facilitate best interests decision-making?Journal of medical ethics · 2025Article
- Enhancing Advance Care Planning in India through a 12-step Pathway.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Experiences of using the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) in English general practice: a qualitative study among key primary health and social care professionals, patients, and their relatives.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- SAFE-GOALS: a protocol for goals of care discussions in the intensive care unit.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Review
- Les objectifs des échanges sur les soins et de la planification préalable des soins chez les patients d'âge pédiatrique atteints d'une maladie grave.Paediatrics & child health · 2024Review
- Goals of care conversations and advance care planning for paediatric patients living with serious illness.Paediatrics & child health · 2024Review
- Navigating end-of-life decision-making in nursing: a systematic review of ethical challenges and palliative care practices.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- An Integrative Review of the State of POLST Science: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2024Review
- Recent Trends in the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Disease : 2017-2021.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2024Article
- Perspectives on advance care planning needs of persons with advanced dementia from their surrogates and clinicians.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Relationship of POLST to Hospitalization and ICU Care Among Nursing Home Residents in California.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Place of Death From Cancer in US States With vs Without Palliative Care Laws.JAMA network open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite its widespread implementation, it is unclear whether Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) are safe and improve the delivery of care that patients desire. We sought to systematically review the influence of POLST on treatment intensity among patients with serious illness and/or frailty.
methodsWe performed a systematic review of POLST and similar programs using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, and PsycINFO, from inception through February 28, 2020. We included adults with serious illness and/or frailty with life expectancy <1 year. Primary outcomes included place of death and receipt of high-intensity treatment (i.e., hospitalization in the last 30- and 90-days of life, ICU admission in the last 30-days of life, and number of care setting transitions in last week of life).
resultsAmong 104,554 patients across 20 observational studies, 27,090 had POLST. No randomized controlled trials were identified. The mean age of POLST users was 78.7 years, 55.3% were female, and 93.0% were white. The majority of POLST users (55.3%) had orders for comfort measures only. Most studies showed that, compared to full treatment orders on POLST, treatment limitations were associated with decreased in-hospital death and receipt of high-intensity treatment, particularly in pre-hospital settings. However, in the acute care setting, a sizable number of patients likely received POLST-discordant care. The overall strength of evidence was moderate based on eight retrospective cohort studies of good quality that showed a consistent, similar direction of outcomes with moderate-to-large effect sizes.
conclusionWe found moderate strength of evidence that treatment limitations on POLST may reduce treatment intensity among patients with serious illness. However, the evidence base is limited and demonstrates potential unintended consequences of POLST. We identify several important knowledge gaps that should be addressed to help maximize benefits and minimize risks of POLST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.