ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2021
Arrhythmia in Cardiomyopathy: Sex and Gender Differences.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the mortality trends in patients with ventricular arrhythmias and congestive heart failure: a 25-year retrospective analysis from 1999 to 2024.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Incidence and risk factors for first and recurrent ICD shock therapy in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025Article
- CD73/adenosine axis exerts cardioprotection against hypobaric hypoxia-induced metabolic shift and myocarditis in a sex-dependent manner.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Article
- Post-mortem genetic testing in sudden cardiac death and genetic screening of relatives at risk: lessons learned from a Czech pilot multidisciplinary study.International journal of legal medicine · 2023Article
- Sudden Death in Men Versus Women with Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2023Review
- Sex-Based Differences in Selected Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Use: A 10-Year Statewide Patient Cohort.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- The Association of Clustered Ventricular Arrhythmia and Cycle Length With Scar Burden in Cardiomyopathy.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2022Article
- Genetic characterization of juvenile sudden cardiac arrest and death in Tuscany: The ToRSADE registry.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThere is emerging evidence for important sex differences in cardiac arrhythmias. In this up-to-date review, we summarise the differences in incidence, aetiology, treatment and prevention of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in women versus men, in the context of ischaemic and nonischaemic cardiomyopathies. RECENT
findingsThe incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia and SCD is significantly lower in women than in men with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, whereas sex differences in nonischaemic cardiomyopathy are less clear. Women who receive a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are less likely to receive appropriate activations, compared to men; however, such findings are limited by under-representation of women. Women with ischaemic cardiomyopathy have significantly lower incidence of VA and SCD compared to men and may not derive the same benefit from a primary prevention ICD. However, further clinical ICD studies are needed that ensure adequate female participation, in order to examine sex differences in outcomes in both ischaemic and nonischaemic cardiomyopathies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.