Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34549333›Full record

SynthesisClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2022

Mobile health solutions for atrial fibrillation detection and management: a systematic review.

Astrid N L Hermans, Monika Gawalko, Lisa Dohmen, Rachel M J van der Velden, Konstanze Betz, David Duncker, Dominique V M Verhaert, Hein Heidbuchel, Emma Svennberg, Lis Neubeck and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Atrial fibrillation burden in clinical practice, research, and technology development: a clinical consensus statement of the European Society of Cardiology Council on Stroke and the European Heart Rhythm Association.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Smartphone app-based symptom assessment in patients with atrial fibrillation on the waiting list for electrical cardioversion: a TeleConvert-atrial fibrillation sub analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Brazilian Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Astrid N L Hermans *Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Monika Gawalko *Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lisa DohmenDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rachel M J van der VeldenDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Konstanze BetzDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
David DunckerDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Heart Rhythm Center and Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Dominique V M VerhaertDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hein HeidbuchelCardiology Department, Antwerp University Hospital and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Emma SvennbergDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lis NeubeckSchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Jens EcksteinDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Deirdre A LaneLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Gregory Y H LipLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Harry J G M CrijnsDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Prashanthan SandersCentre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Jeroen M HendriksCentre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Nikki A H A PluymaekersDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Dominik LinzDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. dominik.linz@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-0824
Maastricht University · NLRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUUniversity of Liverpool · GBAntwerp University Hospital · BEEdinburgh Napier University · GBKarolinska University Hospital · SEMedical University of Warsaw · PLMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe aimed to systematically review the available literature on mobile Health (mHealth) solutions, including handheld and wearable devices, implantable loop recorders (ILRs), as well as mobile platforms and support systems in atrial fibrillation (AF) detection and management.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The electronic databases PubMed (NCBI), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane were searched for articles published until 10 February 2021, inclusive. Given that the included studies varied widely in their design, interventions, comparators, and outcomes, no synthesis was undertaken, and we undertook a narrative review.

resultsWe found 208 studies, which were deemed potentially relevant. Of these studies included, 82, 46, and 49 studies aimed at validating handheld devices, wearables, and ILRs for AF detection and/or management, respectively, while 34 studies assessed mobile platforms/support systems. The diagnostic accuracy of mHealth solutions differs with respect to the type (handheld devices vs wearables vs ILRs) and technology used (electrocardiography vs photoplethysmography), as well as application setting (intermittent vs continuous, spot vs longitudinal assessment), and study population.

conclusionWhile the use of mHealth solutions in the detection and management of AF is becoming increasingly popular, its clinical implications merit further investigation and several barriers to widespread mHealth adaption in healthcare systems need to be overcome. Mobile health solutions for atrial fibrillation detection and management: a systematic review.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationTelemedicineElectrocardiographyHumansAtrial fibrillationmHealthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34549333
PMCPMC8454991
OpenAlexW3201240587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.