Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34549317›Full record

ReviewSurgery today2022

Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: introducing a diagnostic algorithm based on 5 years of follow-up of 152 cases from Turkey and a review of the literature.

Mehmet Velidedeoglu, Veysel Umman, Fahrettin Kilic, Varol Celik, Ertugrul Gazioglu, Engin Hatipoglu, Tulin Ozturk, Birgul Mete

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgery today, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mehmet VelidedeogluDepartment of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34098, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey.
Veysel UmmanDepartment of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34098, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey. veyselumman@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1760-7346
Fahrettin KilicDepartment of Radiology, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Varol CelikDepartment of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34098, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ertugrul GaziogluDepartment of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34098, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey.
Engin HatipogluDepartment of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34098, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey.
Tulin OzturkDepartment of Pathology, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Birgul MeteDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TRIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goals of this study were to report our clinical experience in a single center at a high-volume tertiary university hospital in Istanbul and to introduce a diagnostic algorithm based on a 5-year follow-up of 152 women with biopsy-proven idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM). IGM is an uncommon, non-malignant, chronic inflammatory disease of the mammary gland with an unknown etiology. The symptoms, clinical presentation, and radiologic findings of IGM may resemble carcinomas. To our knowledge, this study comprises the largest series of IGM, especially with a 5-year follow-up, yet reported in the English literature.

methodsThe present study reported our single-center clinical experience at a tertiary university hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, and introduced a diagnostic algorithm using our treatment protocol based on a 5-year follow-up of 152 women with biopsy-proven IGM. Our database of 10 years' experience containing over 700 patients with IGM was evaluated. However, to assess recurrence and resistance to treatment, only the 152 patients with a long follow-up period of 5 years were included in the study group. The analysis included 152 women with biopsy-proven IGM who were treated between January 2009 and March 2014. The clinical data of the presentation, histopathology, and treatment modalities were analyzed by reviewing the medical records.

resultsOf the 152 patients diagnosed with granulomatous mastitis, 32 (21%) recovered by expectant management, while 14 (9%) responded to antibiotics, 65 (43%) received corticosteroids, 20 (13%) had antituberculosis medication, 16 (11%) underwent excision, and 5 (3%) responded to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Fifty-one patients (33%) had recurrence; of these, 30 achieved a cure with second-line treatment, 16 underwent excision, and 5 achieved a cure with observation.

conclusionIGM is a rare benign breast disorder, and clinicians need a high index of suspicion to diagnose it, as IGM can be mistaken for breast cancer. Unlike periductal mastitis, IGM does not evolve secondary to nicotine addiction and is typically seen in women of childbearing age with a recent history of pregnancy and lactation. The diagnosis can be challenging, and an evaluation with a multidisciplinary team is necessary. There is no consensus concerning the definitive treatment approach. We suggested a diagnostic algorithm in the present study, using our treatment protocol based on the 5 years' follow-up of 152 women.

Indexed as

Granulomatous MastitisAlgorithmsBreastFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPregnancyTurkeyBreast lumpCorticosteroidsIdiopathic granulomatous mastitisInflammatory breast carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34549317
OpenAlexW3201163475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.