ArticlePediatric radiology2021
Magnetic resonance imaging findings in the normal pediatric sacroiliac joint space that can simulate disease.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research on automatic recognition radiomics algorithm for early sacroiliac arthritis based on sacroiliac MRI imaging.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Trial
- The immature sacroiliac joints on cross-sectional imaging: developmental anatomy and diagnostic pitfalls.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Evaluation of the Sacroiliac Joint in Pediatric Patients.Arthritis care & research · 2026Article
- Advanced MRI Sequences for Structural Lesion Assessment in Sacroiliitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The sacroiliac joint across ages - what is normal?Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024Review
- MRI in pediatric sacroiliitis, what radiologists should know.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Diagnostics of Sacroiliac Joint Differentials to Axial Spondyloarthritis Changes by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Sacroiliac joint beyond sacroiliitis-further insights and old concepts on magnetic resonance imaging.Skeletal radiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of active sacroiliac joint inflammation include joint space fluid and enhancement, but it is unclear to what extent these are present in normal children.
objectiveTo describe normal MRI appearances of pediatric sacroiliac joint spaces in boys and girls of varying ages. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this ethics-approved prospective study, 251 children (119 boys, 132 girls; mean age: 12.4 years, range: 6.1-18.0 years), had both oblique-coronal T1-weighted and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sacroiliac joint MRI. Of these, 127 were imaged for other reasons and had asymptomatic sacroiliac joints ("normal cohort") while 124 had low back pain with no features of sacroiliitis on initial clinical MRI review ("low-back-pain cohort"). Post-gadolinium T1-weighted sequences were available in 16/127 normal and 124/124 low-back-pain subjects. Three experienced radiologists scored high signal in the sacroiliac joint space on STIR (score 0=absent; 1=high signal compared to normal bone marrow present anywhere in the joint but not as bright as fluid [compared to vessels, cerebrospinal fluid]; 2=definite fluid signal in part of the joint; 3=definite fluid signal, entire vertical height, majority of slices) and, when available, joint space post-contrast enhancement (0=no high signal/enhancement; 1=thin, symmetrical, mildly increased linear high signal present in the joint space; 2=focal, thick or intense enhancement). Associations between joint signal scores, age, gender and sacral apophyseal closure were analysed.
resultsIncreased signal on STIR (score 1-3) was present in 74.7% of pediatric sacroiliac joint spaces, as intense as fluid in 18.4%. There was no significant difference in proportion by gender, side or cohort, but girls showed peak signal earlier than boys (10 years old vs. 12 years old, respectively). On post-gadolinium T1-weighted sequences, a thin rim of increased signal was nearly universally seen in sacroiliac joint spaces without focal, intense or thick post-contrast enhancement.
conclusionSacroiliac joint spaces of most children demonstrate mildly increased signal on STIR, compared to normal bone marrow, and thin rim-like enhancement on post-contrast T1 images, likely related to cartilage. These findings should not be confused with sacroiliitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.