Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34549314›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2021

Magnetic resonance imaging findings in the normal pediatric sacroiliac joint space that can simulate disease.

Nele Herregods, Lennart B O Jans, Joel Paschke, Stefanie L De Buyser, Thomas Renson, Joke Dehoorne, Rik Joos, Robert G W Lambert, Jacob L Jaremko

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The sacroiliac joint across ages - what is normal?Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nele HerregodsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Nele.Herregods@uzgent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-0244-0168
Lennart B O JansDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Joel PaschkeCare Arthritis LTD., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Stefanie L De BuyserBiostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Thomas RensonDepartment of Pediatric Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Joke DehoorneDepartment of Pediatric Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Rik JoosDepartment of Pediatric Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Robert G W LambertDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jacob L JaremkoDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ghent University Hospital · BEUniversity of Alberta · CAGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of active sacroiliac joint inflammation include joint space fluid and enhancement, but it is unclear to what extent these are present in normal children.

objectiveTo describe normal MRI appearances of pediatric sacroiliac joint spaces in boys and girls of varying ages. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this ethics-approved prospective study, 251 children (119 boys, 132 girls; mean age: 12.4 years, range: 6.1-18.0 years), had both oblique-coronal T1-weighted and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sacroiliac joint MRI. Of these, 127 were imaged for other reasons and had asymptomatic sacroiliac joints ("normal cohort") while 124 had low back pain with no features of sacroiliitis on initial clinical MRI review ("low-back-pain cohort"). Post-gadolinium T1-weighted sequences were available in 16/127 normal and 124/124 low-back-pain subjects. Three experienced radiologists scored high signal in the sacroiliac joint space on STIR (score 0=absent; 1=high signal compared to normal bone marrow present anywhere in the joint but not as bright as fluid [compared to vessels, cerebrospinal fluid]; 2=definite fluid signal in part of the joint; 3=definite fluid signal, entire vertical height, majority of slices) and, when available, joint space post-contrast enhancement (0=no high signal/enhancement; 1=thin, symmetrical, mildly increased linear high signal present in the joint space; 2=focal, thick or intense enhancement). Associations between joint signal scores, age, gender and sacral apophyseal closure were analysed.

resultsIncreased signal on STIR (score 1-3) was present in 74.7% of pediatric sacroiliac joint spaces, as intense as fluid in 18.4%. There was no significant difference in proportion by gender, side or cohort, but girls showed peak signal earlier than boys (10 years old vs. 12 years old, respectively). On post-gadolinium T1-weighted sequences, a thin rim of increased signal was nearly universally seen in sacroiliac joint spaces without focal, intense or thick post-contrast enhancement.

conclusionSacroiliac joint spaces of most children demonstrate mildly increased signal on STIR, compared to normal bone marrow, and thin rim-like enhancement on post-contrast T1 images, likely related to cartilage. These findings should not be confused with sacroiliitis.

Indexed as

Sacroiliac JointSacroiliitisChildFemaleGadolinium DTPAHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProspective StudiesGadolinium DTPACartilageChildrenJoint fluidMagnetic resonance imagingNormal findingsPhysiologicalSacroiliac jointSacroiliitis

Identifiers

PMID34549314
OpenAlexW3200085207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.