Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34549287›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2021

Indicative bacterial communities and taxa of disease-suppressing and growth-promoting composts and their associations to the rhizoplane.

Johanna Mayerhofer, Barbara Thuerig, Thomas Oberhaensli, Eileen Enderle, Stefanie Lutz, Christian H Ahrens, Jacques G Fuchs, Franco Widmer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna MayerhoferMolecular Ecology, Agroscope, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1833-2276
Barbara ThuerigCrop Protection and Phytopathology, FiBL Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, 5070, Frick, Switzerland.
Thomas OberhaensliCrop Protection and Phytopathology, FiBL Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, 5070, Frick, Switzerland.
Eileen EnderleCrop Protection and Phytopathology, FiBL Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, 5070, Frick, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6229-8098
Stefanie LutzMolecular Diagnostics, Genomics and Bioinformatics, Agroscope, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Christian H AhrensMolecular Diagnostics, Genomics and Bioinformatics, Agroscope, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8148-7257
Jacques G FuchsCrop Protection and Phytopathology, FiBL Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, 5070, Frick, Switzerland.
Franco WidmerMolecular Ecology, Agroscope, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.
Forschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau · CHAgroscope · CHSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compost applications vary in their plant growth promotion and plant disease suppression, likely due to differences in physico-chemical and biological parameters. Our hypothesis was that bacteria are important for plant growth promotion and disease suppression of composts and, therefore, composts having these traits would contain similar sets of indicative bacterial taxa. Seventeen composts prepared from five different commercial providers and different starting materials were classified accordingly with bioassays using cress plants and the pathogen Pythium ultimum. Using a metabarcoding approach, bacterial communities were assessed in bulk composts and cress rhizoplanes. Six and nine composts showed significant disease suppression or growth promotion, respectively, but these traits did not correlate. Growth promotion correlated positively with nitrate content of composts, whereas disease suppression correlated negatively with factors representing compost age. Growth promotion and disease suppression explained significant portions of variation in bacterial community structures, i.e. 11.5% and 14.7%, respectively. Among the sequence variants (SVs) associated with growth promotion, Microvirga, Acinetobacter, Streptomyces, Bradyrhizobium and Bacillus were highly promising, while in suppressive composts, Ureibacillus,Thermogutta and Sphingopyxis were most promising. Associated SVs represent the basis for developing prediction tools for growth promotion and disease suppression, a highly desired goal for targeted compost production and application.

Indexed as

CompostingPythiumBacteriaSoilSoil MicrobiologySoilamplicon sequencingcompost microbiomediagnosticssequence variantsoil-borne pathogentargeted strain isolation

Identifiers

PMID34549287
PMCPMC8478479
OpenAlexW3199891282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.