Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34549265›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2021

Divergent assembly processes? A comparison of the plant and soil microbiome with plant communities in a glacier forefield.

Robert R Junker, Xie He, Jan-Christoph Otto, Victoria Ruiz-Hernández, Maximilian Hanusch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ecological mechanisms of microbial assembly in clonal plantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert R JunkerDepartment of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7919-9678
Xie HeDepartment of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Jan-Christoph OttoDepartment of Geography, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Victoria Ruiz-HernándezDepartment of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Maximilian HanuschDepartment of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7228-1276

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF Y 1102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community assembly is a result of dispersal, abiotic and biotic characteristics of the habitat as well as stochasticity. A direct comparison between the assembly of microbial and 'macrobial' organisms is hampered by the sampling of these communities in different studies, at different sites or on different scales. In a glacier forefield in the Austrian Alps, we recorded the soil and plant microbiome (bacteria and fungi) and plants that occurred in the same landscape and in close proximity in the same plots. We tested five predictions deduced from assembly processes and revealed deviating patterns of assembly in these community types. In short, microbes appeared to be less dispersal limited than plants and soil microbes, and plants strongly responded to abiotic factors whereas the leaf microbiome was plant species specific and well buffered from environmental conditions. The observed differences in community assembly processes may be attributed to the organisms' dispersal abilities, the exposure of the habitats to airborne propagules and habitat characteristics. The finding that assembly is conditional to the characteristics of the organisms, the habitat and the spatial scale under consideration is thus central for our understanding about the establishment and the maintenance of biodiversity.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoilBiodiversityIce CoverPlantsSoil MicrobiologySoilbacteriadispersalenvironmental filterfungiglacier forefieldinteraction filter

Identifiers

PMID34549265
PMCPMC8478474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.