Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34549193›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2021

Estimates of Maize Plant Density from UAV RGB Images Using Faster-RCNN Detection Model: Impact of the Spatial Resolution.

K Velumani, R Lopez-Lozano, S Madec, W Guo, J Gillet, A Comar, F Baret

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K VelumaniHiphen SAS, 120 Rue Jean Dausset, Agroparc, Bâtiment Technicité, 84140 Avignon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4878-2035
R Lopez-LozanoINRAE, UMR EMMAH, UMT CAPTE, 228 Route de l'Aérodrome, Domaine Saint Paul-Site Agroparc CS 40509, 84914 Avignon Cedex 9, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6499-4743
S MadecArvalis, 228, Route de l'Aérodrome-CS 40509, 84914 Avignon Cedex 9, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5367-184X
W GuoInternational Field Phenomics Research Laboratory, Institute for Sustainable Agro-Ecosystem Services, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3017-5464
J GilletHiphen SAS, 120 Rue Jean Dausset, Agroparc, Bâtiment Technicité, 84140 Avignon, France.
A ComarHiphen SAS, 120 Rue Jean Dausset, Agroparc, Bâtiment Technicité, 84140 Avignon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6919-0469
F BaretINRAE, UMR EMMAH, UMT CAPTE, 228 Route de l'Aérodrome, Domaine Saint Paul-Site Agroparc CS 40509, 84914 Avignon Cedex 9, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7655-8997

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early-stage plant density is an essential trait that determines the fate of a genotype under given environmental conditions and management practices. The use of RGB images taken from UAVs may replace the traditional visual counting in fields with improved throughput, accuracy, and access to plant localization. However, high-resolution images are required to detect the small plants present at the early stages. This study explores the impact of image ground sampling distance (GSD) on the performances of maize plant detection at three-to-five leaves stage using Faster-RCNN object detection algorithm. Data collected at high resolution (GSD ≈ 0.3 cm) over six contrasted sites were used for model training. Two additional sites with images acquired both at high and low (GSD ≈ 0.6 cm) resolutions were used to evaluate the model performances. Results show that Faster-RCNN achieved very good plant detection and counting (rRMSE = 0.08) performances when native high-resolution images are used both for training and validation. Similarly, good performances were observed (rRMSE = 0.11) when the model is trained over synthetic low-resolution images obtained by downsampling the native training high-resolution images and applied to the synthetic low-resolution validation images. Conversely, poor performances are obtained when the model is trained on a given spatial resolution and applied to another spatial resolution. Training on a mix of high- and low-resolution images allows to get very good performances on the native high-resolution (rRMSE = 0.06) and synthetic low-resolution (rRMSE = 0.10) images. However, very low performances are still observed over the native low-resolution images (rRMSE = 0.48), mainly due to the poor quality of the native low-resolution images. Finally, an advanced super resolution method based on GAN (generative adversarial network) that introduces additional textural information derived from the native high-resolution images was applied to the native low-resolution validation images. Results show some significant improvement (rRMSE = 0.22) compared to bicubic upsampling approach, while still far below the performances achieved over the native high-resolution images.

Identifiers

PMID34549193
PMCPMC8404552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.