Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34549192›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2021

Virtual Reality to Improve Sequelae of the Postintensive Care Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study.

Johan H Vlake, Jasper Van Bommel, Evert-Jan Wils, Tim I M Korevaar, O Joseph Bienvenu, Eva Klijn, Diederik Gommers, Michel E van Genderen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Extended reality in anesthesia: a narrative review.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2025
    Review
  15. Mobilization in Neurocritical Care: Challenges and Opportunities.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johan H VlakeDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jasper Van BommelDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Evert-Jan WilsDepartment of Intensive Care, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tim I M KorevaarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
O Joseph BienvenuDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Eva KlijnDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diederik GommersDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michel E van GenderenDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychologic sequelae after critical illness, part of the postintensive care syndrome, significantly decrease quality of life. A robustly effective treatment intervention is currently lacking. Virtual reality has beneficial effects on several non-ICU-related psychologic disorders. The aim of this study was to explore patient-related determinants of ICU-specific virtual reality, such as the timing of patients' self-reported readiness to initiate virtual reality and the number of desired sessions and safety, and to explore the effects of ICU-specific virtual reality on mental health.

designA multicenter, randomized controlled feasibility study.

settingICU at a university teaching hospital and a secondary care hospital in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Consecutive mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis or septic shock.

interventionsPatients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ICU-specific virtual reality (ICU-specific virtual reality group) or exposure to a nature virtual reality environment (control virtual reality group). MEASUREMENT AND MAIN

resultsExplorative outcomes were feasibility, in terms of patient-related determinants, and safety. The effects of ICU-specific virtual reality on the psychologic components of postintensive care syndrome and quality of life were additionally studied. Fifty patients (median age: 61 yr; 21 [42%] female) were included. Patients in the ICU-specific virtual reality group felt ready to initiate the virtual reality intervention 10 days (median, 95% range, 5-21 d) after ICU discharge, and one session (median, 95% range, 1-6) was desired. ICU-specific virtual reality patients experienced higher immersion, cybersickness scores were low, and no changes in vital signs were observed. They also reported reduced posttraumatic stress disorder and depression scores and better mental health from 2 days until 1 month after initial exposure (Short Form-12 Mental Component Scale: ICU-specific virtual reality, 57 [36-67] vs control virtual reality, 47 [26-63];

conclusionsICU-specific virtual reality is a feasible and acceptable novel intervention that could be used during recovery from an episode of critical illness in the ICU. A future, adequately powered study should confirm whether virtual reality is able to improve mental health and quality of life.

Indexed as

depressionintensive care unitpostintensive care syndromeposttraumatic stress disordervirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID34549192
PMCPMC8443843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.