ArticleJournal of lifestyle medicine2021
Variation of Forehead Temperature during Routine Working Shift in Hospital Laboratory Personnel: Implications for SARS-CoV-2 Screening.
Article in Journal of lifestyle medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScarce information is available on circadian body temperature fluctuation in healthy healthcare workers.
methodsForehead temperature was measured with an infrared thermometer in 33 ostensibly healthy laboratory professionals (mean age, 43 ± 13 years; 76% females) throughout a regular working shift, from 800 AM to 300 PM, at 1-hour intervals.
resultsA significant difference was found at different times of the day by 1-way analysis of variance (F statistics, 13.79; p < 0.001). The lowest mean forehead temperature was 36.2 ± 0.3℃, recorded at 100 PM, whilst the highest was 36.7 ± 0.3℃, at 900 AM. The mean difference between forehead temperature at acrophase and nadir was 0.5℃ (95% CI, 0.3-0.6℃; p < 0.001). The forehead temperature measured between 900-1200 AM was also significantly higher than that measured between 100-300 PM (0.3℃; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4℃; p < 0.001). The mean intra-individual variation of forehead temperature was higher but not significantly different in men (1.0 ± 0.2%) compared to women (0.8 ± 0.3%; p = 0.112).
conclusionFever screening protocols for purposes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other infectious diseases monitoring should consider normal daily fluctuations in forehead temperature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.