Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548989›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Differentiating Pemphigus Foliaceus From Pemphigus Vulgaris in Clinical Practice.

Natalie Stumpf, Simo Huang, Lawrence D Hall, Sylvia Hsu

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalie StumpfDepartment of Dermatology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA.
Simo HuangDepartment of Dermatology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA.
Lawrence D HallDepartment of Dermatopathology, Institute for Dermatopathology, Dermpath Diagnostics, Newtown Square, USA.
Sylvia HsuDepartment of Dermatology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA.
Central Dermatology · USDermatopathologie Friedrichshafen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pemphigus is a skin condition that causes intraepidermal separation of keratinocytes. Multiple types of pemphigus exist, including pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. These can be differentiated by histopathology, clinical presentation, appearance of lesions, and antibodies, among other factors. It is important to distinguish between the two because of differences in management and prognosis. Here we present a case of pemphigus foliaceus, as well as a discussion of the key differences between pemphigus foliaceus and vulgaris.

Indexed as

autoimmune bullous dermatosesdirect immunofluorescenceenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (elisa)pemphigus foliaceuspemphigus vulgaris

Identifiers

PMID34548989
PMCPMC8437008
OpenAlexW3199030403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.