Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548940›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2021

Multipoint left ventricular pacing as an addition to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a bridge to the holy grail?

Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou, Panagiotis Xydis, Konstantinos Konstantinou, Nikolaos Magkas, Panagiota Manolakou, Polychronis Dilaveris, Christina Chrysohoou, Konstantinos A Gatzoulis, Costas Tsioufis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christos-Konstantinos AntoniouFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis XydisFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos KonstantinouFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos MagkasFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital Athens, Greece.
Panagiota ManolakouFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital Athens, Greece.
Polychronis DilaverisFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital Athens, Greece.
Christina ChrysohoouFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos A GatzoulisFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital Athens, Greece.
Costas TsioufisFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) constitutes a cornerstone to the treatment of advanced dyssynchronous heart failure (DyssHF); moreover it represents one of the few instances that a revolutionary approach was pursued, yielding previously unfathomable benefits to patients out of realistic therapeutic options. However, as is rather extensively established, nonresponse, or even negative response, to CRT continue to plague its course, precluding favourable effects in up to 40% of recipients, for a multitude of reasons. Given the scope of the issue of nonresponse, attempts to negate it by means of altering CRT delivery mode, and, more specifically, by introducing multipoint left ventricular pacing (MPP) have been focused on. Possible reasons for divergent trial results will be presented, as well as potential criteria for predicting whether MPP activation may reap additional benefits as compared to conventional biventricular pacing (BVP). Finally, an alternative framework for approaching CRT in general will be put forward, including advancements which in the (near) future may once more revolutionise heart failure treatment.

Indexed as

Heart failuremulti-point pacingresychronization therapy

Identifiers

PMID34548940
PMCPMC8449203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.