ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging2021
HISTOPATHOLOGY IMAGE REGISTRATION BY INTEGRATED TEXTURE AND SPATIAL PROXIMITY BASED LANDMARK SELECTION AND MODIFICATION.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From traditional to deep learning approaches in whole slide image registration: A methodological review.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Review
- Deep learning based registration of serial whole-slide histopathology images in different stains.Journal of pathology informatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) digital pathology has been emerging for next-generation tissue based cancer research. To enable such histopathology image volume analysis, serial histopathology slides need to be well aligned. In this paper, we propose a histopathology image registration fine tuning method with integrated landmark evaluations by texture and spatial proximity measures. Representative anatomical structures and image corner features are first detected as landmark candidates. Next, we identify strong and modify weak matched landmarks by leveraging image texture features and landmark spatial proximity measures. Both qualitative and quantitative results of extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed method is robust and can further enhance registration accuracy of our previously registered image set by 31.15% (correlation), 4.88% (mutual information), and 41.02% (mean squared error), respectively. The promising experimental results suggest that our method can be used as a fine tuning module to further boost registration accuracy, a premise of histology spatial and morphology analysis in an information-lossless 3D tissue space for cancer research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.