Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548876›Full record

ArticleJournal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities2021

Remote Support for Adults with Intellectual Disability During COVID-19: From a Caregiver's Perspective.

Klaudia Wos, Celina Kamecka-Antczak, Mateusz Szafrański

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Key learnings from COVID-19 to sustain quality of life for families of individuals with IDD.Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Klaudia WosInterdisciplinary Doctoral School of Social Sciences Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń Torun Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5000-6182
Celina Kamecka-AntczakFaculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń Torun Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8476-9738
Mateusz SzafrańskiFaculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń Torun Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5178-8457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reality of people with ID changed during the pandemic COVID-19. Most institutions supporting people with ID switched to remote work. This required some major adaptation to these individuals' new realities, their immediate families, and facility staff. Supporting and monitoring the quality of life of individuals with disabilities and their family members during a crisis is an essential topic of current research. This research project aimed to explore the experiences of parents of adults with ID in relation to remote support provided by public support agencies. In a qualitative study, the authors used semistructured individual interviews with caregivers of people with ID. Data analysis distinguished the following categories: parents as therapists, organization difficulties, material problems, lack of social contacts, positive solutions, and difficult behavior. The results show the difficulties of parents in balancing professional, domestic, and supporting tasks. The study was the first in Poland to report on the qualitative assessment of remote support for people with ID during COVID-19. Further, more extensive research is needed to search for solutions that respect the rights of people with disabilities to professional support.

Indexed as

adulthoodIDparentspracticeremote support

Identifiers

PMID34548876
PMCPMC8447416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.