Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548831›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021

Comparison of Back-Propagation Neural Network, LACE Index and HOSPITAL Score in Predicting All-Cause Risk of 30-Day Readmission.

Chaohsin Lin, Shuofen Hsu, Hsiao-Feng Lu, Li-Fei Pan, Yu-Hua Yan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Enabling Health Data Sharing with Fine-Grained Privacy.Proceedings of the ... ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chaohsin LinDepartment of Risk Management and Insurance, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Shuofen HsuDepartment of Risk Management and Insurance, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Feng LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Li-Fei PanDepartment of Medical Affair Administration, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5597-9672
Yu-Hua YanDepartment of Medical Research, Tainan Municipal Hospital (Managed by Show Chwan Medical Care Corporation), Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2367-8095
National Kaohsiung University of Science and TechnologyChang Gung University · TWKaohsiung Veterans General Hospital · TWTainan Municipal Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main purpose of this study is to predict the all-cause risk of 30-day readmission by employing the back-propagation neural network (BPNN) in comparison with traditional risk assessment tools of LACE index and HOSPITAL scores.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study from January 1st, 2018 to December 31st, 2019. A total of 55,688 hospitalizations from a medical center in Taiwan were examined. The LACE index (length of stay, acute admission, Charlson comorbidity index score, emergency department visits in previous 6 months) and HOSPITAL score (hemoglobin level at discharge, discharge from an Oncology service, sodium level at discharge, procedure during hospital stay, Index admission type, number of hospital admissions during the previous year, length of stay) are calculated. We employed variables from LACE index and HOSPITAL score as the input vector of BPNN for comparison purposes.

resultsThe BPNN constructed in the current study has a considerably better ability with a C statistics achieved 0.74 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.75), which is statistically significant larger than that of the other two models using DeLong's test. Also, it was possible to achieve higher sensitivity (70.32%) without penalizing the specificity (71.76%) and accuracy (71.68%) at its optimal threshold, which is at the 20% of patients with the highest predicted risk. Moreover, it is much more informative than the other two methods because of a considerably higher LR+ and a lower LR-.

conclusionOur findings suggest that more attention should be paid to methods based on non-linear classification systems, as they lead to substantial differences in risk-scores.

Indexed as

30-day readmissionback-propagation neural networkBPNNhealthcare qualityHOSPITALLACE

Identifiers

PMID34548831
PMCPMC8449689
OpenAlexW3199445878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.