Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548714›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2021

High-Dimensional Precision Medicine From Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Naim U Rashid, Daniel J Luckett, Jingxiang Chen, Michael T Lawson, Longshaokan Wang, Yunshu Zhang, Eric B Laber, Yufeng Liu, Jen Jen Yeh, Donglin Zeng and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. PROBABILISTIC LEARNING OF TREATMENT TREES IN CANCER.The annals of applied statistics · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naim U RashidDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Daniel J LuckettDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jingxiang ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Michael T LawsonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Longshaokan WangDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Yunshu ZhangDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Eric B LaberDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Yufeng LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jen Jen YehLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Donglin ZengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Michael R KosorokDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Tumor Subtypes and Therapy Response in Pancreatic CancerR01CA199064 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TSAI, SUSAN, YEH, JEN JEN · 2016 to 2021
$4.4M
Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Improve Dynamic Treatment Regimens Estimation Using Real World Data.R01GM124104 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Yuanjia Wang, Donglin Zeng · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
Semiparametric Analysis of Big Censored DataR01HL149683 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, DANYU · 2020 to 2023
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NCI NIH HHS R01 CA199064NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149683NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complexity of human cancer often results in significant heterogeneity in response to treatment. Precision medicine offers the potential to improve patient outcomes by leveraging this heterogeneity. Individualized treatment rules (ITRs) formalize precision medicine as maps from the patient covariate space into the space of allowable treatments. The optimal ITR is that which maximizes the mean of a clinical outcome in a population of interest. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) studies permit the evaluation of multiple treatments within a single tumor, and thus are ideally suited for estimating optimal ITRs. PDX data are characterized by correlated outcomes, a high-dimensional feature space, and a large number of treatments. Here we explore machine learning methods for estimating optimal ITRs from PDX data. We analyze data from a large PDX study to identify biomarkers that are informative for developing personalized treatment recommendations in multiple cancers. We estimate optimal ITRs using regression-based (Q-learning) and direct-search methods (outcome weighted learning). Finally, we implement a superlearner approach to combine multiple estimated ITRs and show that the resulting ITR performs better than any of the input ITRs, mitigating uncertainty regarding user choice. Our results indicate that PDX data are a valuable resource for developing individualized treatment strategies in oncology. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDeep learning autoencodersMachine learningOutcome weighted learningPrecision medicineQ-learning

Identifiers

PMID34548714
PMCPMC8451968
OpenAlexW3090304051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.