Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548701›Full record

ArticleThe Review of income and wealth2022

Welfare Resilience at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Selection of European Countries: Impact on Public Finance and Household Incomes.

Olga Cantó, Francesco Figari, Carlo V Fiorio, Sarah Kuypers, Sarah Marchal, Marina Romaguera-de-la-Cruz, Iva V Tasseva, Gerlinde Verbist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Review of income and wealth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olga CantóUniversidad de Alcalá and EQUALITAS.
Francesco FigariUniversity of Insubria ISER University of Essex CeRP Collegio Carlo Alberto and Dondena Bocconi University.
Carlo V FiorioUniversity of Milan Irvapp-FBK and Dondena Bocconi University.
Sarah KuypersHerman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy University of Antwerp.
Sarah MarchalHerman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy University of Antwerp.
Marina Romaguera-de-la-CruzUniversidad Antonio de Nebrija.
Iva V TassevaDepartment of Social Policy London School of Economics and Political Science.
Gerlinde VerbistHerman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy University of Antwerp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper assesses the impact on household incomes of the COVID-19 pandemic and governments' policy responses in April 2020 in four large and severely hit EU countries: Belgium, Italy, Spain and the UK. We provide comparative evidence on the level of relative and absolute welfare resilience at the onset of the pandemic, by creating counterfactual scenarios using the European tax-benefit model EUROMOD combined with COVID-19-related household surveys and timely labor market data. We find that income poverty increased in all countries due to the pandemic while inequality remained broadly the same. Differences in the impact of policies across countries arose from four main sources: the asymmetric dimension of the shock by country, the different protection offered by each tax-benefit system, the diverse design of discretionary measures and differences in the household level circumstances and living arrangements of individuals at risk of income loss in each country.

Indexed as

COVID‐19cross‐country comparisonhousehold incomesincome protectiontax‐benefit microsimulation

Identifiers

PMID34548701
PMCPMC8447427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.