Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548672›Full record

ReviewBiologia2022

Ticks and their epidemiological role in Slovakia: from the past till present.

Michal Stanko, Markéta Derdáková, Eva Špitalská, Mária Kazimírová

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Zoonotic Pathogens inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. First Record ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Two decades of research onFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. The role of wildlife in the epidemiology of tick-borne diseases in Slovakia.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Review
  11. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2023.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Novel Genetic Lineages ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michal StankoInstitute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovakia.
Markéta DerdákováInstitute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 06 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Eva ŠpitalskáInstitute of Virology, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Mária KazimírováInstitute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 06 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-6904-8342
Institute of Chemistry of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKBiomedical Research Center of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Slovakia, 22 tick species have been found to occur to date. Among them,

Indexed as

AnaplasmaBabesiaBorreliaCoxiella burnetiiFrancisella tularensisRickettsiaTick-borne encephalitis virusTick-borne pathogens

Identifiers

PMID34548672
PMCPMC8446484
OpenAlexW3198920451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.