Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548669›Full record

ArticleJMIRx med

Utility of the ROX Index in Predicting Intubation for Patients With COVID-19-Related Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Receiving High-Flow Nasal Therapy: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Maulin Patel, Junad Chowdhury, Nicole Mills, Robert Marron, Andrew Gangemi, Zachariah Dorey-Stein, Ibraheem Yousef, Matthew Zheng, Lauren Tragesser, Julie Giurintano and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIRx med. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The timing of intubation and principles of ICU care in COVID-19Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Maulin PatelDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7432-7255
Junad ChowdhuryDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-0661
Nicole MillsDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3808-867X
Robert MarronDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7959-8492
Andrew GangemiDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3255-7746
Zachariah Dorey-SteinDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2469-1913
Ibraheem YousefDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2577-2387
Matthew ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6399-1997
Lauren TragesserDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6558-1924
Julie GiurintanoDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7104-3900
Rohit GuptaDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8764-6538
Parth RaliDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-8137
Gilbert D'AlonzoDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5615-3132
Huaqing ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0953-4768
Nicole PatlakhDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2155-0218
Nathaniel MarchettiDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3229-8879
Gerard CrinerDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-3483
Matthew GordonDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2775-2918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) to treat COVID-19 pneumonia has been greatly debated around the world due to concerns about increased health care worker transmission and delays in invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Herein, we analyzed the utility of the noninvasive ROX (ratio of oxygen saturation) index to predict the need for and timing of IMV.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess whether the ROX index can be a useful score to predict intubation and IMV in patients receiving HFNT as treatment for COVID-19-related hypoxemic respiratory failure.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort analysis of 129 consecutive patients with COVID-19 admitted to Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia, PA, from March 10, 2020, to May 17, 2020. This is a single-center study conducted in designated COVID-19 units (intensive care unit and other wards) at Temple University Hospital. Patients with moderate and severe hypoxemic respiratory failure treated with HFNT were included in the study. HFNT patients were divided into two groups: HFNT only and intubation (ie, patients who progressed from HFNT to IMV). The primary outcome was the value of the ROX index in predicting the need for IMV. Secondary outcomes were mortality, rate of intubation, length of stay, and rate of nosocomial infections in a cohort treated initially with HFNT.

resultsOf the 837 patients with COVID-19, 129 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 60.8 (SD 13.6) years, mean BMI was 32.6 (SD 8) kg/m², 58 (45%) were female, 72 (55.8%) were African American, 40 (31%) were Hispanic, and 48 (37.2%) were nonsmokers. The mean time to intubation was 2.5 (SD 3.3) days. An ROX index value of less than 5 at HFNT initiation was suggestive of progression to IMV (odds ratio [OR] 2.137,

conclusionsThe ROX index helps decide which patients need IMV and may limit eventual morbidity and mortality associated with the progression to IMV.

Indexed as

COVID-19intubationmechanical ventilationmedicinemorbiditymortalitynasal therapyrespiratoryventilators

Identifiers

PMID34548669
PMCPMC8404242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.