Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548636›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2022

Evaluation of in vitro activity of five antimicrobial agents on Acanthamoeba isolates and their toxicity on human corneal epithelium.

Kirti Megha, Megha Sharma, Chayan Sharma, Amit Gupta, Rakesh Sehgal, Sumeeta Khurana

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Efficacy of phosphonium amphiphilic salts against Acanthamoeba genotype T4.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tropical parasitology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirti MeghaDepartment of Medical Parasitology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Megha SharmaDepartment of Medical Parasitology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-0493
Chayan SharmaDepartment of Medical Parasitology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Amit GuptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rakesh SehgalDepartment of Medical Parasitology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sumeeta KhuranaDepartment of Medical Parasitology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. sumeetakhurana@hotmail.com.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is an important cause of ocular morbidity in both contact lens wearers and non wearers. Medical management comprises prolonged empiric treatment with multiple drugs, leading to adverse effects and suboptimal cure. The present study evaluated the efficiency and safety of common antimicrobial agents used in treatment of AK.

methodsSix Acanthamoeba isolates (four AK, two water samples) were axenized and subjected to in vitro susceptibility testing against chlorhexidine, pentamidine isethionate, polymyxin B, miltefosine, and fluconazole to check for trophocidal and cysticidal activity. The safety profile was analysed by observing the cytotoxicity of the highest cidal concentration toward human corneal epithelial cell (HCEC) line.

resultsChlorhexidine had the lowest cidal concentration against both cysts and trophozoites (range 4.16-25 μg/ml) followed by pentamidine isethionate (range 25-166.7 μg/ml). Both agents were nontoxic to HCEC. Polymyxin B (range 25-200 μg/ml) and fluconazole (range 64-512 μg/ml) had relatively higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC); fluconazole was nontoxic even at 1024 μg/ml, but cytotoxicity was observed at 400 μg/ml with polymyxin B. Miltefosine was not effective against cysts at tested concentrations. A. castellanii were more susceptible to all agents (except pentamidine isethionate) than A. lenticulata. Clinical isolates were less susceptible to polymyxin B and fluconazole than environmental isolates, reverse was true for miltefosine.

conclusionChlorhexidine and pentamidine isethionate were the most effective and safe agents against both trophozoites and cysts forms of our Acanthamoeba isolates. Fluconazole had higher MIC but was nontoxic. Polymyxin B was effective at high MIC but therapeutic dose was found toxic. Miltefosine, at tested concentrations, could not inhibit cysts of Acanthamoeba. Clinical isolates had higher MICs for polymyxin B and fluconazole.

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaAcanthamoeba KeratitisAnti-Infective AgentsEpithelium, CornealChlorhexidineFluconazoleHumansPentamidinePolymyxin BWaterAnti-Infective AgentsChlorhexidineFluconazolePentamidinePolymyxin BWater

Identifiers

PMID34548636
PMCPMC9500015
OpenAlexW3199871020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.