Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548428›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical ethics2021

Pediatric Intensivist and Pediatric Neurologist Perspectives and Practices on Death by Neurologic Criteria.

Leslie Mataya, Lainie Friedman Ross, Ahmeneh Ghavam, Erin Talati Paquette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Themes in the Management of Pediatric Brain Death Contestation: Exploratory Qualitative Work From Multidisciplinary Health Professionals in the United States.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leslie MatayaFellow in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA. matayal@chop.edu.
Lainie Friedman RossCarolyn and Matthew Bucksbaum Professor of Clinical Ethics; Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Medicine, Surgery and the College; Co-Director of the Institute for Translational Medicine; and Associate Director of the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics at the University of Chicago in Chicago, Illinois USA. lross@peds.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Ahmeneh GhavamAssistant Professor of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine and Comer Children's Hospital in Chicago, Illinois USA. aghavam@peds.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Erin Talati PaquetteAssistant Professor of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, and Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute; and is Assistant Professor of Law (courtesy) at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law in Chicago, Illinois USA. epaquette@luriechildrens.org.

Funding

ADaPT to Engage: Assessing for Disparities and Potential Targets for Intervention to Engage Acutely Ill Children in ResearchK23HD098289 · NICHD · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI PAQUETTE, ERIN D · 2020 to 2024
$722k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD098289NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD089260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controversies surrounding the determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC), also known as brain death, have become increasingly common over the last decade, occasionally leading to parental refusal of all or part of an evaluation or declaration of DNC. We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study of pediatric neurologists and intensivists who participate in professional listservs to ascertain perspectives and practices concerning the evaluation of DNC, specifically on obtaining permission for evaluations and managing refusals. Of the 334 respondents who had performed an evaluation for DNC, 35 percent reported they had experienced at least one parental refusal, and 64.4 percent reported that they did not seek permission to perform an evaluation. Pediatric neurologists, careproviders who had less experience doing evaluations, and careproviders who had experienced parental refusal of an evaluation were more likely to obtain permission from parents. Most (80.8 percent) of respondents reported that their institution had a DNC policy. We found variability in many aspects of DNC evaluations and declarations, as well as the handling of refusals. Lack of consistency may make it more difficult for careproviders and families. Greater understanding of parental refusal of DNC evaluation is essential to inform efforts to increase consistency.

Indexed as

Brain DeathNeurologistsChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansParentsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34548428
PMCPMC9275594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.