Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548375›Full record

SynthesisLupus science & medicine2021

Achieving remission or low disease activity is associated with better outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review.

Manuel Francisco Ugarte-Gil, Claudia Mendoza-Pinto, Cristina Reátegui-Sokolova, Guillermo J Pons-Estel, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, George Bertsias, Graciela S Alarcon, Bernardo A Pons-Estel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lupus science & medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manuel Francisco Ugarte-GilGrupo Peruano de Estudio de Enfermedades Autoinmunes Sistémicas, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru mugarte@cientifica.edu.pe.ORCID 0000-0003-1728-1999
Claudia Mendoza-PintoSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.
Cristina Reátegui-SokolovaRheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0003-3421-2717
Guillermo J Pons-EstelCentro Regional de Enfermedades Autoinmunes y Reumáticas (GO-CREAR), Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Ronald F van VollenhovenAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6438-8663
George BertsiasMedical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Graciela S AlarconSchool of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Bernardo A Pons-EstelCentro Regional de Enfermedades Autoinmunes y Reumáticas (GO-CREAR), Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2518-0266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemission and low disease activity (LDA) have been proposed as the treatment goals for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Several definitions for each have been proposed in the literature.

objectiveTo assess the impact of remission/LDA according to various definitions on relevant outcomes in patients with SLE.

methodsThis systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses using PubMed (1946-week 2, April 2021), Cochrane library (1985-week 2, week 2, April 2021) and EMBASE (1974-week 2, April 2021). We included longitudinal and cross-sectional studies in patients with SLE reporting the impact of remission and LDA (regardless their definition) on mortality, damage accrual, flares, health-related quality of life and other outcomes (cardiovascular risk, hospitalisation and direct costs). The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

resultsWe identified 7497 articles; of them, 31 studies met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Some articles reported a positive association with survival, although this was not confirmed in all of them. Organ damage accrual was the most frequently reported outcome, and remission and LDA were reported as protective of this outcome (risk measures varying from 0.04 to 0.95 depending on the definition). Similarly, both states were associated with a lower probability of SLE flares, hospitalisations and a better health-related quality of life, in particular the physical domain.

conclusionRemission and LDA are associated with improvement in multiple outcomes in patients with SLE, thus reinforcing their relevance in clinical practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020162724.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicQuality of LifeCross-Sectional StudiesHumanshealth careoutcome assessmentquality of lifesystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID34548375
PMCPMC8458331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.