Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548372›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Cognitive-bias modification intervention to improve physical activity in patients following a rehabilitation programme: protocol for the randomised controlled IMPACT trial.

Boris Cheval, Axel Finckh, Silvio Maltagliati, Layan Fessler, Stéphane Cullati, David Sander, Malte Friese, Reinout W Wiers, Matthieu P Boisgontier, Delphine S Courvoisier and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06066021 (Evaluation of a Health Education Program for Type 2 Diabetes Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06066021 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of a Health Education Program for Type 2 Diabetes Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssociation for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and ImageRan2023 to 2024Enrolled27ConditionsRetinopathy, DiabeticArmshealth educational sessions in diabetic patients type 2.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Boris ChevalSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland boris.cheval@unige.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-6236-4673
Axel FinckhDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Silvio MaltagliatiLaboratory SENS, Department of Sport Science, University Grenoble Alpes, Saint-Martin-d'Heres, France.
Layan FesslerLaboratory SENS, Department of Sport Science, University Grenoble Alpes, Saint-Martin-d'Heres, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8435-5110
Stéphane CullatiPopulation Health Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
David SanderSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Malte FrieseDepartment of Psychology, Saarland University, Saarbrucken, Germany.
Reinout W WiersDepartment of Psychology and center for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthieu P BoisgontierSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9376-3071
Delphine S CourvoisierQuality of Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1956-2607
Christophe LuthyDivision of General Medical Rehabilitation, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBeing physically active is associated with a wide range of health benefits in patients. However, many patients do not engage in the recommended levels of physical activity (PA). To date, interventions promoting PA in patients mainly rely on providing knowledge about the benefits associated with PA to develop their motivation to be active. Yet, these interventions focusing on changing patients' conscious goals have proven to be rather ineffective in changing behaviours. Recent research on automatic factors (eg, automatic approach tendencies) may provide additional targets for interventions. However, the implementation and evaluation of intervention designed to change these automatic bases of PA are rare. Consequently, little is known about whether and how interventions that target automatically activated processes towards PA can be effective in changing PA behaviours. The Improving Physical Activity (IMPACT) trial proposes to fill this knowledge gap by investigating the effect of a cognitive-bias modification intervention aiming to modify the automatic approach towards exercise-related stimuli on PA among patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The IMPACT trial is a single-centre, placebo (sham controlled), triple-blinded, phase 3 randomised controlled trial that will recruit 308 patients enrolled in a rehabilitation programme in the Division of General Medical Rehabilitation at the University Hospital of Geneva (Switzerland) and intends to follow up them for up to 1 year after intervention. Immediately after starting a rehabilitation programme, patients will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive either the cognitive-bias modification intervention consisting of a 12-session training programme performed over 3 weeks or a control condition (placebo). The cognitive-bias modification intervention aims to improve PA levels through a change in automatic approach tendencies towards PA and sedentary behaviours. The primary outcome is the sum of accelerometer-based time spent in light-intensity, moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity PA over 1 week after the cognitive-bias modification intervention (in minutes per week). Secondary outcomes are related to changes in (1) automatic approach tendencies and self-reported motivation to be active, (2) physical health and (3) mental health. Sedentary behaviours and self-reported PA will also be examined. The main time point of the analysis will be the week after the end of the intervention. These outcomes will also be assessed during the rehabilitation programme, as well as 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention for secondary analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Geneva Canton, Switzerland (reference number: CCER2019-02257). All participants will give an informed consent to participate in the study. Results will be published in relevant scientific journals and be disseminated in international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: The clinical trial was registered at the German clinical trials register (reference number: DRKS00023617); Pre-results.

Indexed as

ExerciseOccupational TherapyBiasCognitionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSwitzerlandquality in health carerehabilitation medicinesports medicine

Identifiers

PMID34548372
PMCPMC8458354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.