Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548341›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Protocol for the e-POWUS Project: multicentre blinded-randomised controlled trial of ultrasound speed choice to improve sonography quality in pregnant women with obesity.

Amélie Delabaere, Benoit Chauveau, Didier Lémery, Amandine Ollier, Candy Guiguet-Auclair, Charline Mourgues, Anne Legrand

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04212234 (Echography in Pregnant Obese Women and Ultrasound Speed.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04212234 nacompletednot on this map

Echography in Pregnant Obese Women and Ultrasound Speed.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRan2019 to 2024Enrolled596ConditionsObese Women, Pregnant WomenArmsultrasound propagation velocities, ultrasound fetal quality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amélie DelabaereObstetrics and Gynaecology, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France adelabaere@chu-clermontferrand.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-6871-9044
Benoit ChauveauRadiology, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Didier LémeryObstetrics and Gynaecology, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Amandine OllierCRECHE, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Candy Guiguet-AuclairEA 4681, PEPRADE, Clermont University, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Charline MourguesEA 4681, PEPRADE, Clermont University, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Anne LegrandObstetrics and Gynaecology, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring pregnancy, maternal obesity increases the risk of fetal abnormalities. Despite advances in ultrasound imaging, the assessment of fetal anatomy is less thorough among these women. Currently, the construction of ultrasound images uses a conventional ultrasound propagation velocity (1540 m/s), which does not correspond to the slower speed of propagation in fat tissue.The main objective of this randomised study is to compare the completeness of fetal ultrasonography according to whether the operator could choose the ultrasound velocity (1420, 1480 or 1540 m/s) or was required to apply the 1540 m/s velocity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised trial is an impact study to compare a diagnostic innovation with the reference technique. The trial inclusion criteria require that a pregnant woman with obesity be undergoing a fetal morphology examination by ultrasound from 20 ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research protocol does not change the standard management. The only possible impact is an improvement of the ultrasound examination by improving the quality of the image and the completeness of morphological examination. The TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) Registry (NCT04212234).

Indexed as

ObesityPregnant PeopleFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPregnancyPrenatal CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUltrasonography, Prenatalprenatal diagnosisultrasonographyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID34548341
PMCPMC8458366
OpenAlexW3200348562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.