Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548319›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Precision Dosing of Targeted Therapies Is Ready for Prime Time.

Stefanie L Groenland, Remy B Verheijen, Markus Joerger, Ron H J Mathijssen, Alex Sparreboom, Jos H Beijnen, Jan H Beumer, Neeltje Steeghs, Alwin D R Huitema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Challenges of Systemic Therapy Investigations for Bone Sarcomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stefanie L GroenlandDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Remy B VerheijenDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Markus JoergerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5667-5697
Alex SparreboomDivision of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Jos H BeijnenDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jan H BeumerCancer Therapeutics Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-8978-9401
Neeltje Steeghs *Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alwin D R Huitema *Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. a.huitema@nki.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1939-4639

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
NCI ET-CTN with Phase i Emphasis at UPCIUM1CA186690 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD, Farshid Dayyani · 2014 to 2026
$9.1M
The Chesapeake-Ohio Pharmacokinetics Core for The ETCTNU24CA247648 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jan Hendrik Beumer, Mitch A Phelps · 2020 to 2026
$3.6M
PITT-CAL ETCTN PK Resource LaboratoryU24CA247643 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TIMOTHY W SYNOLD, Raman Venkataramanan · 2020 to 2026
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS U24 CA247643NCI NIH HHS U24 CA247648NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fixed dosing of oral targeted therapies is inadequate in the era of precision medicine. Personalized dosing, based on pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure, known as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), is rational and supported by increasing evidence. The purpose of this perspective is to discuss whether randomized studies are needed to confirm the clinical value of precision dosing in oncology. PK-based dose adjustments are routinely made for many drugs and are recommended by health authorities, for example, for patients with renal impairment or for drug-drug interaction management strategies. Personalized dosing simply extrapolates this paradigm from selected patient populations to each individual patient with suboptimal exposure, irrespective of the underlying cause. If it has been demonstrated that exposure is related to a relevant clinical outcome, such as efficacy or toxicity, and that exposure can be optimized by PK-guided dosing, it could be logically assumed that PK-guided dosing would result in better treatment outcomes without the need for randomized confirmatory trials. We propose a path forward to demonstrate the clinical relevance of individualized dosing of molecularly-targeted anticancer drugs.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringPrecision MedicineDrug InteractionsHumansMedical Oncology

Identifiers

PMID34548319
PMCPMC8934568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.