Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548106›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2021

Effects of household chaos and parental responsiveness on child executive functions: a novel, multi-method approach.

Krysta Andrews, James R Dunn, Heather Prime, Eric Duku, Leslie Atkinson, Ashwini Tiwari, Andrea Gonzalez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adaptation and validation for use in Brazil of the Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale (CHAOS).Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krysta AndrewsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, MIP 201A, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
James R DunnDepartment of Health, Aging, and Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Heather PrimeDepartment of Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
Eric DukuDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, MIP 201A, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Leslie AtkinsonDepartment of Psychology, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria St., Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada.
Ashwini TiwariInstitute of Public and Preventive Health, Augusta University, 1120 15th St., Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Andrea GonzalezDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, MIP 201A, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. gonzal@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 410-2010-2079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExecutive functions can be adversely affected by contextual risks in the home environment including chaos and parenting challenges. Furthermore, household chaos negatively influences parenting practices. Few studies, however, have examined the role of parenting in the association between household chaos and child executive functions.

methodsUsing a sample of 128 school-aged children (mean = 61.9 months, SD = 2.0, range 58-68 months) and their mothers, the present study examined direct and indirect effects (via parental responsiveness) of household chaos on child executive functioning. Multi-measures were used including performance-based assessments, behavioural observations, questionnaires, and video-home tours.

resultsHousehold chaos had both a direct effect on child executive functions (β = - .31, 95% CI [- .58, - .04]) and an indirect effect (β = - .05, 95% [- .13, - .01]) via parental responsiveness. Further, the indirect effect was only significant for household instability.

conclusionThese findings indicate that parental responsiveness may be compromised by household chaos, with implications for the executive functions of school-aged children. Preventative strategies are needed to improve the stability in the home and strengthen parenting practices.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionFamily CharacteristicsChildFemaleHumansMothersParentingParentsChildExecutive functionsHousehold chaosParental responsiveness

Identifiers

PMID34548106
PMCPMC8456676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.