Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548022›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

Falls prevention at GP practices: a description of daily practice.

Wytske M A Meekes, Chantal J Leemrijse, Yvette M Weesie, Ien A M van de Goor, Gé A Donker, Joke C Korevaar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wytske M A MeekesTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Postbus 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, Netherlands. w.m.a.meekes@tilburguniversity.edu.
Chantal J LeemrijseNIVEL, Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Yvette M WeesieNIVEL, Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ien A M van de GoorTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Postbus 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Gé A DonkerNIVEL, Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Joke C KorevaarNIVEL, Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLTilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) can be considered the designated professionals to identify high fall risk and to guide older people to fall preventive care. Currently it is not exactly known how GPs treat this risk. This study aims to investigate GPs' daily practice regarding fall preventive care for frail older patients.

methodsSixty-five GPs from 32 Dutch practices participated in this study for a period of 12 months. When a GP entered specific International Classification of Primary Care-codes related to frailty and/or high fall risk in their Electronic Health Records, a pop-up appeared asking "Is this patient frail?". If the GP confirmed this, the GP completed a short questionnaire about patient's fall history and fear of falling (FOF), and the fall preventive care provided.

resultsThe GPs completed questionnaires regarding 1394 frail older patients aged ≥75. Of 20% of these patients, the GPs did not know whether they had experienced a fall or not. The GPs did not know whether a FOF existed in even more patients (29%). Of the patients with a fall history and/or a FOF (N = 726), 37% (N = 271) received fall preventive care. Two main reasons for not offering fall preventive care to these patients were: I) the patient finds treatment too intensive or too much of a hassle (37%), and II) the GP identified a high fall risk but the patient did not acknowledge this (14%). When patients were treated for high fall risk, the GP and the physiotherapist were the most frequently involved health care providers. The involved health care providers most often treated mobility limitations, cardiovascular risk factors, and FOF.

conclusionsThe results from this study show that GPs were frequently not aware of their frail patient's fall history and/or FOF and that the majority of the frail older patients with a fall history and/or FOF did not receive fall preventive care. Developing systematic screening strategies for the primary care setting enhancing the identification of high fall risk and the provision of fall preventive care may improve patients' quality of life and reduce health care costs.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsGeneral PractitionersAgedFearHumansMobility LimitationQuality of LifeFalls preventionFrail older peoplePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID34548022
PMCPMC8454103
OpenAlexW3199037449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.