Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34547972›Full record

ReviewRenal failure2021

Contrast associated nephropathy after intravenous administration: what is the magnitude of the problem?

Jean-Sebastien Rachoin, Yanika Wolfe, Sharad Patel, Elizabeth Cerceo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Renal failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Robotic Assisted Ultrasound-Guided Endovascular Stent Implantation in a Vascular Model.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jean-Sebastien RachoinDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA.
Yanika WolfeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA.
Sharad PatelDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA.
Elizabeth CerceoDivision of Hospital Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous contrast media (CM) is often used in clinical practice to enhance CT scan imaging. For many years, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) was thought to be a common occurrence and to result in dire consequences. When treating patients with abnormal renal function, it is not unusual that clinicians postpone, cancel, or replace contrast-enhanced imaging with other, perhaps less informative tests. New studies however have challenged this paradigm and the true risk attributable to intravenous CM for the occurrence of CIN has become debatable. In this article, we review the latest relevant medical literature and aim to provide an evidence-based answer to questions surrounding the risk, outcomes, and potential mitigation strategies of CIN after intravenous CM administration.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAdministration, IntravenousContrast MediaHumansInjections, Intra-ArterialKidney Failure, ChronicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaAcute kidney injurycontrast-induced nephropathyCT scanESRDincidenceoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID34547972
PMCPMC8462873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.