Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34547457›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2022

The temporal course of T- and B-cell responses to vaccination with BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273.

Robert Markewitz, Daniela Pauli, Justina Dargvainiene, Katja Steinhagen, Sarah Engel, Victor Herbst, Dorinja Zapf, Christina Krüger, Shahpour Sharifzadeh, Benjamin Schomburg and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Seroconversion rate after primary vaccination with two doses of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 in solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Effects ofNutrients · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Differential T-Cell Immunity to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in mRNA-1273- and BNT162b2-Vaccinated Individuals.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [SARS-CoV-2 variants in relation to screening and vaccines].Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert MarkewitzInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. Electronic address: Robert.markewitz@uksh.de.
Daniela PauliInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Justina DargvainieneInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Katja SteinhagenInstitute for Experimental Immunology, EUROIMMUN AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Sarah EngelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Victor HerbstInstitute for Experimental Immunology, EUROIMMUN AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Dorinja ZapfInstitute for Experimental Immunology, EUROIMMUN AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Christina KrügerInstitute for Experimental Immunology, EUROIMMUN AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Shahpour SharifzadehInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Benjamin SchomburgInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Frank LeypoldtInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Jan RuppDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Siegfried GörgInstitute of Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Ralf JunkerInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Klaus-Peter WandingerInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEEuroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika (Germany) · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the response of the immune system (and its influencing factors) to vaccination with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273.

methods531 vaccinees, recruited from healthcare professionals, donated samples before, in between, and after the administration of the two doses of the vaccine. T- and B-cell responses were examined via interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release assay, and antibodies against different epitopes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (S1 and NCP) were detected via ELISA and surrogate neutralization assay. Results were correlated with influencing factors such as age, sex, prior infection, vaccine received (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273), and immunosuppression. Furthermore, antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) were measured to screen for autoimmune responses following vaccination with an mRNA vaccine.

resultsNo markers of immunity against SARS-CoV-2 were found before the first vaccination. Two weeks after it, specific responses against SARS-CoV-2 were already measurable (median ± median absolute deviation (MAD): anti-S1 IgG 195.5 ± 172.7 BAU/mL; IgA 6.7 ± 4.9 OD; surrogate neutralization 39 ± 23.7%), and were significantly increased two weeks after the second dose (anti-S1 IgG 3744 ± 2571.4 BAU/mL; IgA 12 ± 0 OD; surrogate neutralization 100 ± 0%, IFN-γ 1897.2 ± 886.7 mIU/mL). Responses were stronger for younger participants (this difference decreasing after the second dose). Further influences were previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 (causing significantly stronger responses after the first dose compared to unexposed individuals (p ≤ 0.0001)) and the vaccine received (significantly stronger reactions for recipients of mRNA-1273 after both doses, p < 0.05-0.0001). Some forms of immunosuppression significantly impeded the immune response to the vaccination (with no observable immune response in three immunosuppressed participants). There was no significant induction of ANAs by the vaccination (no change in qualitative ANA results (p 0.2592) nor ANA titres (p 0.08) from pre-to post-vaccination.

conclusionsBoth vaccines elicit strong and specific immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 which become detectable one week (T-cell response) or two weeks (B-cell response) after the first dose.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-22019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GmRNA VaccinesVaccinationVaccines, Synthetic2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GmRNA VaccinesVaccines, SyntheticBNT162b2COVID-19Immune responsemRNA-1273SARS-CoV-2Vaccination

Identifiers

PMID34547457
PMCPMC8450229
OpenAlexW3200071174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.