Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34547057›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Individual differences in COVID-19 mitigation behaviors: The roles of age, gender, psychological state, and financial status.

Joel Myerson, Michael J Strube, Leonard Green, Sandra Hale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distress Signals: Age Differences in Psychological Distress before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  8. COVID-19 health practices and attitudes in the United States: the role of trust in healthcare.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joel MyersonDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8108-9892
Michael J StrubeDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Leonard GreenDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Sandra HaleDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

DECISION-MAKING IN YOUNGER AND OLDER ADULTS: A DISCOUNTING FRAMEWORKR01AG058885 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GREEN, LEONARD S, MYERSON, JOEL · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study examined individual characteristics potentially associated with changes in mitigation behaviors (social distancing and hygiene) recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Analysis of online survey responses from 361 adults, ages 20-78, with US IP addresses, identified significant correlates of adaptive behavioral changes, with implications for preventive strategies and mental health needs. The extent to which individuals changed their mitigation behaviors was unrelated to self-rated health or concern regarding the personal effects of COVID-19 but was related to concern regarding the effects of the pandemic on others. Thus, mitigation behaviors do not appear to be primarily motivated by self-protection. Importantly, adaptive changes in mitigation behaviors increased with age. However, these changes, particularly those related to the frequency of close proximity encounters, appear to be due to age-related decreases in anxiety and depression. Taken together, the present results argue against over-reliance on 'fear appeals' in public health messages as they may increase anxiety and depression. Instead, the present findings argue for more appeals to people's concern for others to motivate mitigation as well as indicating an immediate need to address individual mental health concerns for the sake of society as a whole.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAgedAge FactorsAnxietyDepressionEconomic StatusFemaleHumansIndividualityMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPandemicsPhysical DistancingSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34547057
PMCPMC8454939
OpenAlexW3185888696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.