ArticlePloS one2021
Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Gender equality in education and community pharmacy practice in the Middle East: A systematic review of literature.Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Experiences and perceptions of sexism in dementia research careers: A global cross-sectional survey.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Article
- Expectation vs. reality: How stereotypes and expectation disconfirmation affect job evaluations in online labor markets.PloS one · 2025Article
- "We have to look deeper into why": perspectives on problem identification and prioritization of women's and girls' health across United Nations agencies.Globalization and health · 2024Article
- Age and gender differences in the value development of Dutch adults in 11 years of longitudinal data.Journal of research in personality · 2024Article
- Article
- Does gender diversity mediate the relationships of diversity beliefs and workplace happiness?Frontiers in sociology · 2024Article
- Conversational agents enhance women's contribution in online debates.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Correction: Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gender equality is a major problem that places women at a disadvantage thereby stymieing economic growth and societal advancement. In the last two decades, extensive research has been conducted on gender related issues, studying both their antecedents and consequences. However, existing literature reviews fail to provide a comprehensive and clear picture of what has been studied so far, which could guide scholars in their future research. Our paper offers a scoping review of a large portion of the research that has been published over the last 22 years, on gender equality and related issues, with a specific focus on business and economics studies. Combining innovative methods drawn from both network analysis and text mining, we provide a synthesis of 15,465 scientific articles. We identify 27 main research topics, we measure their relevance from a semantic point of view and the relationships among them, highlighting the importance of each topic in the overall gender discourse. We find that prominent research topics mostly relate to women in the workforce-e.g., concerning compensation, role, education, decision-making and career progression. However, some of them are losing momentum, and some other research trends-for example related to female entrepreneurship, leadership and participation in the board of directors-are on the rise. Besides introducing a novel methodology to review broad literature streams, our paper offers a map of the main gender-research trends and presents the most popular and the emerging themes, as well as their intersections, outlining important avenues for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.