Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34546971›Full record

SynthesisJournal of behavioral addictions2021

Internet-based treatment of gambling problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Dominic Sagoe, Mark D Griffiths, Eilin Kristine Erevik, Turid Høyland, Tony Leino, Ida Alette Lande, Mie Engen Sigurdsson, Ståle Pallesen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Innovations to improve outcomes and uptake of psychotherapies for mental disorders: a state-of-the-art review.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dominic Sagoe1 Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1902-9378
Mark D Griffiths3 International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8880-6524
Eilin Kristine Erevik1 Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8829-8571
Turid Høyland1 Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Tony Leino1 Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ida Alette Lande1 Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Mie Engen Sigurdsson1 Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ståle Pallesen1 Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5831-0840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe effect of internet-based psychological treatment for gambling problems has not been previously investigated by meta-analysis. The present study is therefore a quantitative synthesis of studies on the effects of internet-based treatment for gambling problems. Given that effects may vary according to the presence of therapist support and control conditions, it was presumed that subgroup analyses would elucidate such effects.

methodsA systematic search with no time constraints was conducted in PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Two authors independently extracted data using a predefined form, including study quality assessment based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Effect sizes were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was indexed by Cochran's Q and the I 2 statistics. Publication bias was investigated using trim and fill.

resultsThirteen studies were included in the analysis. Random effects models at post-treatment showed significant effects for general gambling symptoms (g = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.43-1.03), gambling frequency (g = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.14-0.45), and amount of money lost gambling (g = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.11-0.27). The corresponding findings at follow-up were g = 1.20 (95% CI = 0.79-1.61), g = 0.36 (95% CI = 0.12-0.60), and g = 0.20 (95% CI = 0.12-0.29) respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that for general gambling symptoms, studies with therapist support yield larger effects than studies without, both post-treatment and at follow-up. Additionally, on general gambling symptoms and gambling frequency, there were lower effect sizes for studies with a control group compared to studies without a control group at follow-up. Studies with higher baseline severity of gambling problems were associated with larger effect sizes at both posttreatment and follow-up than studies with more lenient inclusion criteria concerning gambling problems. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsInternet-based treatment has the potential to reach a large proportion of persons with gambling problems. Results of the meta-analysis suggest that such treatments hold promise as an effective approach. Future studies are encouraged to examine moderators of treatment outcomes, validate treatment effects cross-culturally, and investigate the effects of novel developments such as ecological momentary interventions.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyGamblingHumansInternetRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomee-therapyinternet-based treatmentmeta-analysisonline therapyproblem gamblingrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID34546971
PMCPMC8997228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.