ArticleAnnals of family medicine
Primary Care 2.0: A Prospective Evaluation of a Novel Model of Advanced Team Care With Expanded Medical Assistant Support.
Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2023Pooled it
- Implementation of Expanding Primary Care Teams to Improve Anemia Diagnosis.Journal of primary care & community healthTrial
- Article
- What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Introducing the TDM-20: A Validated 20-Item Instrument to Measure Team Development.Family medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical and economic outcomes of multidisciplinary team members in primary care: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Qualitative Verification of Machine Learning-Based Burnout Predictors in Primary Care Physicians: An Exploratory Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Integrating a High Blood Pressure Advisory Across a Primary Care Network.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Preserving Continuity and Trust in Primary Care: Strategies for Implementing Team-Based Models in South Tyrol, Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Ambient artificial intelligence scribes: utilization and impact on documentation time.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Predicting Primary Care Physician Burnout From Electronic Health Record Use Measures.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2024Observational
- How Primary Care Clinicians Process Patient Death: Logistics, Emotions, and Opportunities for Structural Support.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- The Association of Teamlets and Teams with Physician Burnout and Patient Outcomes.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Observational
- Implementation and Qualitative Evaluation of a Primary Care Redesign Model with Expanded Scope of Work for Medical Assistants.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Addressing the Use of Teams in Primary Care.Annals of family medicineArticle
- Primary Care Practice Characteristics Associated With Medical Assistant Staffing Ratios.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAssess effectiveness of Primary Care 2.0: a team-based model that incorporates increased medical assistant (MA) to primary care physician (PCP) ratio, integration of advanced practice clinicians, expanded MA roles, and extended the interprofessional team.
methodsProspective, quasi-experimental evaluation of staff/clinician team development and wellness survey data, comparing Primary Care 2.0 to conventional clinics within our academic health care system. We surveyed before the model launch and every 6-9 months up to 24 months post implementation. Secondary outcomes (cost, quality metrics, patient satisfaction) were assessed via routinely collected operational data.
resultsTeam development significantly increased in the Primary Care 2.0 clinic, sustained across all 3 post implementation time points (+12.2, +8.5, + 10.1 respectively, vs baseline, on the 100-point Team Development Measure) relative to the comparison clinics. Among wellness domains, only "control of work" approached significant gains (+0.5 on a 5-point Likert scale,
conclusionsThe Primary Care 2.0 model of enhanced team-based primary care demonstrates team development is a plausible key to protect against burnout, but is not sufficient alone. The results reinforce that transformation to team-based care cannot be a 1-time effort and institutional commitment is integral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.