Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34546888›Full record

ReviewThe western journal of emergency medicine2021

Cancer-related Emergency Department Visits: Comparing Characteristics and Outcomes.

Rahul V Nene, Jesse J Brennan, Edward M Castillo, Peter Tran, Renee Y Hsia, Christopher J Coyne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigation of the reasons and frequency of oncology patients over the age of 65 who apply to the emergency department.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Lung cancer in the emergency department.Emergency cancer care · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rahul V NeneUniversity of California, San Diego, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Diego, California.
Jesse J BrennanUniversity of California, San Diego, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Diego, California.
Edward M CastilloUniversity of California, San Diego, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Diego, California.
Peter TranUniversity of California, San Diego, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Diego, California.
Renee Y HsiaUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Christopher J CoyneUniversity of California, San Diego, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Diego, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is increasing appreciation of the challenges of providing safe and appropriate care to cancer patients in the emergency department (ED). Our goal here was to assess which patient characteristics are associated with more frequent ED revisits.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of all ED visits in California during the 2016 calendar year using data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. We defined revisits as a return visit to an ED within seven days of the index visit. For both index and return visits, we assessed various patient characteristics, including age, cancer type, medical comorbidities, and ED disposition.

resultsAmong 12.9 million ED visits, we identified 73,465 adult cancer patients comprising 103,523 visits that met our inclusion criteria. Cancer patients had a 7-day revisit rate of 17.9% vs 13.2% for non-cancer patients. Cancer patients had a higher rate of admission upon 7-day revisit (36.7% vs 15.6%). Patients with cancers of the small intestine, stomach, and pancreas had the highest rate of 7-day revisits (22-24%). Cancer patients younger than 65 had a higher 7-day revisit rate than the elderly (20.0% vs 16.2%).

conclusionIn a review of all cancer-related ED visits in the state of California, we found a variety of characteristics associated with a higher rate of 7-day ED revisits. Our goal in this study was to inform future research to identify interventions on the index visit that may improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient ReadmissionAdultAgedCaliforniaEmergency Service, HospitalFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMedicareRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34546888
PMCPMC8463053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.