Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34546884›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2021

Mobile Crisis Outreach and Emergency Department Utilization: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

J Priyanka Vakkalanka, Ryan A Neuhaus, Karisa K Harland, Lance Clemsen, Elaine Himadi, Sangil Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J Priyanka VakkalankaUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
Ryan A NeuhausUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
Karisa K HarlandUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
Lance ClemsenUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
Elaine HimadiUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Iowa City, Iowa.
Sangil LeeUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.

Funding

The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardU54TR001356 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2015 to 2016
$7.1M
SHORT-TERM TRAINING: STUDENTS IN HEALTH PROF. SCHOOLST35HL007485 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROGHAIR, ROBERT D · 1985 to 2019
$4.3M
ACL HHS R49CE002108NCATS NIH HHS U54 TR001356NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMental health and substance use disorder (MHSUD) patients in the emergency department (ED) have been facing increasing lengths of stay due to a shortage of inpatient beds. Previous research indicates mobile crisis outreach (MCO) reduces long ED stays for MHSUD patients. Our objective was to assess the impact of MCO contact on future ED utilization.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to a large Midwest university ED with an MHSUD chief complaint from 2015-2018. We defined the exposure as those who had MCO contact and any MHSUD-related ED visit within 30 days of MCO contact. The MCO patients were 2:1 propensity score-matched by demographic data and comorbidities matched to patients with no MCO contact. Outcomes were all-cause and psychiatric-specific reasons for return to the ED within one year of the index ED visit. We report descriptive statistics and odds ratios (OR) to describe the difference between the two groups, and hazard ratios (HR) to estimate the risk of return ED visit.

resultsThe final sample included 106 MCO and 196 non-MCO patients. The MCO patients were more likely to be homeless (OR 14.8; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.87, 117), less likely to have adequate family or social support (OR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31, 0.84), and less likely to have a hospital bed requested for them in the index visit by ED providers (OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29, 0.88). For those who returned to the ED, the median time for all-cause return to the ED was 28 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 6-93 days) for the MCO patients and 88 days (IQR: 20-164 days) for non-MCO patients. The risk of all-cause return to the ED was greater among MCO patients (67%) compared to non-MCO patients (49%) (adjusted HR: 1.66; 95% CI, 1.22, 2.27).

conclusionThe MCO patients had less family and social support; however, they were less likely to require hospitalization for each visit, likely due to MCO involvement. Patients with MCO contact presented to the ED more frequently than non-MCO patients, which implies a strong linkage between the ED and MCO in our community. An effective referral to community service from the ED and MCO and collaboration could be the next step to improve healthcare utilization.

Indexed as

MedicareAdultAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34546884
PMCPMC8463043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.