Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34546506›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Embryo re-expansion does not affect clinical pregnancy rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective study.

Hunter Giunco, Meghan Connerney, Caitlin Boylan, Nathanael Koelper, Jennifer Mersereau, Dara S Berger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: predictive embryonic factors.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hunter GiuncoUNC Fertility, 7920 ACC Blvd. Suite 300, Raleigh, NC, 27617, USA. Hgiunco@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6938-7547
Meghan ConnerneyUNC Fertility, 7920 ACC Blvd. Suite 300, Raleigh, NC, 27617, USA.
Caitlin BoylanUNC Fertility, 7920 ACC Blvd. Suite 300, Raleigh, NC, 27617, USA.
Nathanael KoelperDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Jennifer MersereauUNC Fertility, 7920 ACC Blvd. Suite 300, Raleigh, NC, 27617, USA.
Dara S BergerUNC Fertility, 7920 ACC Blvd. Suite 300, Raleigh, NC, 27617, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USHouston Fertility Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA retrospective study examining the effects of embryo re-expansion before transfer on pregnancy outcomes for frozen embryo transfers (FET).

methodsA total of 486 FET cycles from November 2017 through December 2019 were studied. These cycles included patients using autologous, donor oocytes, and donor embryo with patients ranging from ages 23 to 48 years with infertility diagnoses. Programmed FET priming was performed with exogenous estrogen and progesterone. All blastocysts were cultured in trigas incubators for 20 min to 4 h and 42 min. Pictures of each blastocyst after thaw and before transfer were taken utilizing the Hamilton Thorne Zilos laser software (Beverly, MA). The longest portion of the embryo was measured in µm. Pregnancy was defined by a positive hCG, and ongoing clinical pregnancy was defined by the presence of fetal cardiac activity. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to access differences in change parameters.

resultsThere is no significant difference in the amount of embryo expansion or contraction to achieve an ongoing pregnancy. The difference remained non-significant when stratified by embryo expansion or contraction. The amount of change over time and percent change from the first measurement were also not associated with achieving an ongoing pregnancy. This remained true after adjustment for patient age and whether or not a biopsy was performed.

conclusionsEmbryos that do not re-expand after warming appear to have a similar chance of achieving a successful pregnancy as those that do re-expand.

Indexed as

Pregnancy RateAdultBirth RateBlastocystCryopreservationEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryo, MammalianEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleLive BirthMiddle AgedOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeEmbryo cultureEmbryologyFrozen embryo transfer (FET)Re-expansionVitrification

Identifiers

PMID34546506
PMCPMC8608931
OpenAlexW3200566531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.