Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34546454›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Clinical features of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome to BRAF inhibitors with and without previous immune checkpoint inhibition: a review.

Nolan J Maloney, Jasmine Rana, Jason J Yang, Lisa C Zaba, Bernice Y Kwong

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Systemic Therapy for Melanoma: What Surgeons Need to Know.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nolan J MaloneyDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, 780 Welch Road, CJ220F, Palo Alto, CA, 94304-5779, USA.
Jasmine RanaDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, 780 Welch Road, CJ220F, Palo Alto, CA, 94304-5779, USA.
Jason J YangDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine At UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lisa C ZabaDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, 780 Welch Road, CJ220F, Palo Alto, CA, 94304-5779, USA.
Bernice Y KwongDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, 780 Welch Road, CJ220F, Palo Alto, CA, 94304-5779, USA. bernicek@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9677-9332
Stanford Medicine · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCutaneous reactions to BRAF inhibitors are common, but severe reactions resembling or consistent with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) are relatively rare. Several reports suggest that cutaneous reactions including DRESS/DIHS to BRAF inhibitors are more frequent and severe in the setting of previous immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI).

methodsTo characterize existing literature on these reports, we queried the PubMed/MEDLINE database for cases of DIHS/DRESS to BRAF inhibitors.

resultsWe identified 23 cases of DIHS to BRAF inhibitors following checkpoint inhibition and 14 cases without prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy. In both cohorts, DIHS occurred relatively early, with median time to onset from drug exposure of 8-10 days. Patients who received prior ICI were less likely to have peripheral eosinophilia (26% vs 71%), atypical lymphocytes (9% vs 50%), renal involvement (61% vs 79%), hepatic involvement (52% vs 86%), and lymphadenopathy (9% vs 43%) compared to patients who did not receive prior ICI. Thrombocytopenia was more common with prior ICI (17% vs 7%). Only patients who received prior ICI experienced hypotension (26%) during the course of their DIHS. All cases of BRAF-induced DIHS generally improved on systemic steroids/supportive care, and no cases of death were identified.

conclusionDermatologists should consider a diagnosis of DIHS following BRAF inhibitor initiation, particularly in the setting of past checkpoint inhibition, with atypical features including relatively rapid onset and steroid responsiveness, lack of peripheral eosinophilia, lymphocytosis, or lymphadenopathy, and increased risk of thrombocytopenia and hypotension.

Indexed as

Drug Hypersensitivity SyndromeEosinophiliaHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF protein, humanImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF inhibitorDIHSDRESS syndromeDrug-induced hypersensitivity syndromeDrug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptomsImmune checkpoint inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID34546454
OpenAlexW3199353720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.