ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022
Higher risk of hemorrhage and maternal morbidity in vaginal birth after second stage of labor C-section.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protective effect of rooming-in on postpartum hemorrhage: A propensity score analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a postpartum hemorrhage risk prediction model for advanced maternal age women undergoing vaginal delivery: a comparison of multiple machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating rates and factors associated with cesarean section and inpatient cost among low-risk deliveries in selected U.S. states.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Impact of Different Delivery Modalities on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes During Prolonged Deceleration in the Second Stage of Labor: A Retrospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated the association between timing and indication for previous cesarean section (C-section) and its association with postpartum risks for adverse maternal outcomes, primarily postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).
methodsThis retrospective case-control study examined women following term vaginal delivery in a university-affiliated medical center between 2008 and 2018. Postpartum complications were compared between women who had their first VBAC and a control group comprised of women who had vaginal delivery without prior C-section. Additional analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the timing of previous C-section and the severity of postpartum adverse outcomes.
resultsOf the women meeting the inclusion criteria (n = 2879), 1,455 had VBAC and 1,424 were in the control group. Overall, significant postpartum complications, primarily PPH, were observed in the VBAC group compared to controls. Women who underwent C-section during second-stage of labor experienced higher PPH rates and increased drop in hemoglobin levels compared to women who underwent C-section during the first stage of labor or an elective C-Sect. (4.3 ± 0.9 g/dL vs. 2.8 ± 1.1 g/dL vs. 2.4 ± 0.8, p = 0.033). Concomitant increased need for blood transfusion (8.1% vs. 3.5% vs. 2.9%, respectively, p < 0.0001) and uterine atony (12.6% vs. 6.2% vs. 4.4%, respectively, p = 0.009) were also observed. No significant differences were demonstrated in other postpartum adverse effects evaluated.
conclusionVBAC is associated with higher rates of postpartum complications, primarily PPH. The risk is significantly increased in VBAC following a second stage cesarean section. This data should be taken into consideration in the management of laboring women after C-section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.