Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34546427›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2022

Pre-medication with oral anticoagulants is associated with better outcomes in a large multinational COVID-19 cohort with cardiovascular comorbidities.

Marina Rieder, Nadine Gauchel, Klaus Kaier, Carolin Jakob, Stefan Borgmann, Annika Y Classen, Jochen Schneider, Lukas Eberwein, Martin Lablans, Maria Rüthrich and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Marina Rieder *Department of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Nadine Gauchel *Department of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. nadine.gauchel@universitaets-herzzentrum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1276-9920
Klaus KaierInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Carolin JakobDepartment I for Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefan BorgmannDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Ingolstadt Hospital, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Annika Y ClassenDepartment I for Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jochen SchneiderSchool of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Lukas Eberwein4Th Department of Internal Medicine, Klinikum Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany.
Martin LablansFederated Information Systems, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Maria RüthrichDepartment for Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Sebastian DolffDepartment of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Kai WilleUniversity Clinic for Haematology, Oncology, Haemostaseology and Palliative Care, Johannes Wesling Medical Center Minden, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Martina HaselbergerDepartment of Medicine I, Passau Municipal Hospital, Passau, Germany.
Hanno HeuzerothDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Ernst-Von-Bergmann, Potsdam, Germany.
Christoph BodeDepartment of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Constantin von Zur MühlenDepartment of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Siegbert Rieg *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Daniel Duerschmied *Department of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEJena University Hospital · DEJohannes Wesling Klinikum Minden · DEKlinikum Ernst von Bergmann · DEKlinikum Ingolstadt · DEKlinikum Leverkusen · DEKlinikum Passau · DETUM Klinikum · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 413517907Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 422681845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCoagulopathy and venous thromboembolism are common findings in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and are associated with poor outcome. Timely initiation of anticoagulation after hospital admission was shown to be beneficial. In this study we aim to examine the association of pre-existing oral anticoagulation (OAC) with outcome among a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. METHODS AND

resultsWe analysed the data from the large multi-national Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (LEOSS) from March to August 2020. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were eligible for inclusion. We retrospectively analysed the association of pre-existing OAC with all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome measures included COVID-19-related mortality, recovery and composite endpoints combining death and/or thrombotic event and death and/or bleeding event. We restricted bleeding events to intracerebral bleeding in this analysis to ensure clinical relevance and to limit reporting errors. A total of 1 433 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients were analysed, while 334 patients (23.3%) had an existing premedication with OAC and 1 099 patients (79.7%) had no OAC. After risk adjustment for comorbidities, pre-existing OAC showed a protective influence on the endpoint death (OR 0.62, P = 0.013) as well as the secondary endpoints COVID-19-related death (OR 0.64, P = 0.023) and non-recovery (OR 0.66, P = 0.014). The combined endpoint death or thrombotic event tended to be less frequent in patients on OAC (OR 0.71, P = 0.056).

conclusionsPre-existing OAC is protective in COVID-19, irrespective of anticoagulation regime during hospital stay and independent of the stage and course of disease.

Indexed as

AgedAnticoagulantsBlood Coagulation DisordersComorbidityCOVID-19EuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsCOVID-19Oral anticoagulationSARS-CoV-2Thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID34546427
PMCPMC8453472
OpenAlexW3201251239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.