Observational studyPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2022
Modified Schwartz formula and
Observational study in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Mendelian randomization analysis revealed that albuminuria is the key factor affecting socioeconomic status in CKD patients.Renal failure · 2024Article
- The association between prolonged capillary refill time and microcirculation changes in children with sepsis.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Clinical characteristics and early identification of augmented renal clearance in PICU patients with severe sepsis associated with MRSA infection.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- uNGAL Predictive Value for Serum Creatinine Decrease in Critically Ill Children.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Individualized medication based on pharmacogenomics and treatment progress in children with IgAV nephritis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies comparing the modified Schwartz formula with measured GFR (m-GFR) are lacking in critically ill children.
methodsThis prospective cohort study enrolled children aged 1 month to 12 years, within 24 h of admission. m-GFR measured by technetium-99m-labeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (
resultsA total of 208 pairs were analyzed. e-GFR showed good agreement with m-GFR with a mean bias of -4.37 ml/min/1.73 m
conclusionsThe modified Schwartz formula shows good agreement with
trial registrationProtocol accessible at Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) www.ctri.nic.in . (Trial Registered Prospectively and Registration No. CTRI/2017/10/010014) ([Registered on: 06/10/2017] Trial Registered Prospectively.) (Title "Measured glomerular filtration rate using Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) renal scan versus estimated glomerular filtration rate using modified Schwartz formula in critically ill children: A prospective observational, analytical study."). A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.