SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2021
How Self-tracking and the Quantified Self Promote Health and Well-being: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of Patient-Generated Health Data From Consumer-Grade Devices by Health Care Professionals in the Clinic: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Barriers and Enablers to Integrating Patient-Generated Health Data in Shared Decision-Making From Health Care Professional and Patient Perspectives: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Digital N-of-1 trials and their application in experimental physiology.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- An Apple-watch all day keeps your life astray-or does it?Scandinavian journal of public health · 2026Article
- The digital heartbeat: a qualitative descriptive study on women's views on preventing cardiovascular disease in primary care.Family practice · 2026Article
- Rethinking Ethics for an Era of Trusted Computational Tools.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2026Review
- A global call to action on the digital determinants of health.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Use of Health and Well-Being Technology, Basic Psychological Needs, and the Mediating Role of Technological Identity in 6 European Countries: Prospective Longitudinal Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Patient Perspectives on Quantified Self Technologies and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Diabetes in Zimbabwe.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Wellby, a Cocreated Mobile App and Wearable to Support Stress Management and Overall Well-Being: Mixed Methods Acceptability and Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Deployment of an Activity Monitoring Program to Complement a Clinical Intervention for Veterans With Gulf War Illness: Qualitative Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Designing an mHealth App to Encourage Uptake of Muscle-Strengthening Exercise in Older Adults: Co-Design Focus Group Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Commitment to Self-Tracking Among Wearable-Device Users: Validation of the C2ST Scale and Known-Groups Evidence.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Article
- Negotiating privacy and responsibility in digital public health: a qualitative study of the social and ethical implications of peer-to-peer health data sharing.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Living well? The unintended consequences of highly popular commercial fitness apps through social listening using Machine-Assisted Topic Analysis: Evidence from X.British journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- The quantified baby: real-world use of infant sleep monitoring technologies and its impact on parent mental health and medical decision-making.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Use of a Wearable Self-Tracking Instrument by Refugees With Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Qualitative Study of Psychotherapeutic Mediation and Engagement.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Effect of Self-Quantification on Caregiver Burden and Depression Among Family Caregivers: A SWING-Japan Study.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2025Article
- Adolescent Self-Reflection Process Through Self-Recording on Multiple Health Metrics: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Predicting Clinical Outcomes at the Toronto General Hospital Transitional Pain Service via the Manage My Pain App: Machine Learning Approach.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-tracking technologies are widely used in people's daily lives and health care. Academic research on self-tracking and the quantified self has also accumulated rapidly in recent years. Surprisingly, there is a paucity of research that reviews, classifies, and synthesizes the state of the art with respect to self-tracking and the quantified self.
objectiveOur objective was to identify the state of the art of self-tracking and the quantified self in terms of health and well-being.
methodsWe have undertaken a systematic literature review on self-tracking and the quantified self in promoting health and well-being. After a rigorous literature search, followed by inclusions, exclusions, and the application of article quality assessment protocols, 67 empirical studies qualified for the review.
resultsOur results demonstrate that prior research has focused on 3 stakeholders with respect to self-tracking and the quantified self, namely end users, patients and people with illnesses, and health care professionals and caregivers. We used these stakeholder groups to cluster the research themes of the reviewed studies. We identified 11 research themes. There are 6 themes under the end-user cluster: user motivation and goal setting, usage and effects of self-tracking, continuance intention and long-term usage, management of personal data, rejection and discontinuance, and user characteristics. The patient and people with illnesses cluster contains three themes: usage experience of patients and people with illnesses, management of patient-generated data, and advantages and disadvantages in the clinical context. The health care professional and caregiver cluster contains two themes: collaboration among patients, health care professionals, and caregivers, and changes in the roles of patients and professionals. Moreover, we classified the future research suggestions given in the literature into 5 directions in terms of research designs and research topics. Finally, based on our reflections on the observations from the review, we suggest four future research directions: (1) users' cognitions and emotions related to processing and interpreting the information produced by tracking devices and apps; (2) the dark side of self-tracking (eg, its adverse psychosocial consequences); (3) self-tracking as a societal phenomenon; and (4) systemic impacts of self-tracking on health care and the actors involved.
conclusionsThis systematic literature review contributes to research and practice by assisting future research activities and providing practitioners with a concise overview of the state of the art of self-tracking and the quantified self.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.