Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34546098›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2021

Connecting the Dots from Professional Development to Student Learning.

Charlene L Ellingson, Katherine Edwards, Gillian H Roehrig, M Clark Hoelscher, Rachelle A Haroldson, Janet M Dubinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charlene L EllingsonDepartment of Elementary and Literacy Education, Mankato State University, MN 56001.
Katherine EdwardsMinnesota Department of Education, Roseville, MN 55113.
Gillian H RoehrigSTEM Education Center, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
M Clark HoelscherSTEM Education Center, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Rachelle A HaroldsonDepartment of Teacher Education, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, WI 54022.
Janet M DubinskyDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Funding

BRAIN to High SchoolsR25OD011131 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DUBINSKY, JANET M · 2012 to 2013
$513k
NIH HHS R25 OD011131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following professional development (PD), implementation of contemporary topics into high school biology requires teachers to make critical decisions regarding integration of novel content into existing course scope and sequence. Often exciting topics, such as neuroscience, do not perfectly align with standards. Despite commitment to enacting what was learned in the PD, teachers must adapt novel content to their perceptions of good teaching, local context, prior knowledge of their students, and state and district expectations. How teachers decide to integrate curricula encountered from PD programs may affect student outcomes. This mixed-methods study examined the relationship between curricular application strategies following an inquiry-based neuroscience PD and student learning. Post-PD curricular implementation was measured qualitatively through analysis of teacher action plans and classroom observations and quantitatively using hierarchical linear modeling to determine the impact of implementation on student performance. Participation in neuroscience PD predicted improved student learning compared with control teachers. Of the two distinct curricular implementation strategies, enacting a full unit produced significantly greater student learning than integrating neuroscience activities into existing biology units. Insights from this analysis should inform teacher implementation of new curricula after PD on other contemporary biology topics.

Indexed as

NeurosciencesStudentsCurriculumHumansLearningSchools

Identifiers

PMID34546098
PMCPMC8715783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.