ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Uncertainty in denoising of MRSI using low-rank methods.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Low-Rank Denoising Methods for Dynamic Deuterium MRSI at 7 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Feasibility of High-Resolution Deuterium Metabolic Imaging of the Human Kidney Using Concentric Ring Trajectory Sampling at 7T.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- 3D deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI) of the human liver at 7 T using low-rank and subspace model-based reconstruction.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Deuterium metabolic imaging phenotypes mouse glioblastoma heterogeneity through glucose turnover kinetics.eLife · 2025Article
- Feasibility and comparison of 3D modified rosette ultra-short echo time (PETALUTE) with conventional weighted acquisition inScientific reports · 2025Article
- Concentric Ring Trajectory Sampling With k-Space Reordering Enables Assessment of Tissue-Specific TNMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Improving Brain Metabolite Detection with a Combined Low-Rank Approximation and Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model Approach.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Whole-brain deuterium metabolic imaging via concentric ring trajectory readout enables assessment of regional variations in neuronal glucose metabolism.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- 3D ultra-short echo timeResearch square · 2024Article
- Three-dimensional, 2.5-minute, 7T phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of the human heart using concentric rings.NMR in biomedicine · 2023Article
- Signal-to-Noise Ratio Enhancement of Single-Voxel In VivoMetabolites · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLow-rank denoising of MRSI data results in an apparent increase in spectral SNR. However, it is not clear if this translates to a lower uncertainty in metabolite concentrations after spectroscopic fitting. Estimation of the true uncertainty after denoising is desirable for downstream analysis in spectroscopy. In this work, the uncertainty reduction from low-rank denoising methods based on spatiotemporal separability and linear predictability in MRSI are assessed. A new method for estimating metabolite concentration uncertainty after denoising is proposed. Automatic rank threshold selection methods are also assessed in simulated low SNR regimes.
methodsAssessment of denoising methods is conducted using Monte Carlo simulation of proton MRSI data and by reproducibility of repeated in vivo acquisitions in 5 subjects.
resultsIn simulated and in vivo data, spatiotemporal based denoising is shown to reduce the concentration uncertainty, but linear prediction denoising increases uncertainty. Uncertainty estimates provided by fitting algorithms after denoising consistently underestimate actual metabolite uncertainty. However, the proposed uncertainty estimation, based on an analytical expression for entry-wise variance after denoising, is more accurate. It is also shown automated rank threshold selection using Marchenko-Pastur distribution can bias the data in low SNR conditions. An alternative soft-thresholding function is proposed.
conclusionLow-rank denoising methods based on spatiotemporal separability do reduce uncertainty in MRS(I) data. However, thorough assessment is needed as assessment by SNR measured from residual baseline noise is insufficient given the presence of non-uniform variance. It is also important to select the right rank thresholding method in low SNR cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.