Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34545714›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2021

Estimation of diffuse Cherenkov optical emission from external beam radiation build-up in tissue.

Savannah Decker, Daniel Alexander, Rachael Hachadorian, Rongxiao Zhang, David Gladstone, Petr Bruza, Brian Pogue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessment of Linac photon dose delivery on Cherenkov production.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Hybrid Monte Carlo model for efficient tissue Cherenkov emission estimation to assess changes from beam size, energy and incidence.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Savannah DeckerThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, United States.
Daniel AlexanderThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, United States.
Rachael HachadorianThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, United States.
Rongxiao ZhangThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, United States.
David GladstoneThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, United States.
Petr BruzaThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, United States.
Brian PogueThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, United States.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
OPTICAL CHERENKOV IMAGING DOSIMETRY IN HUMAN RADIOTHERAPYR01EB023909 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GLADSTONE, DAVID J., JARVIS, LESLEY A · 2017 to 2024
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceOptical imaging of Cherenkov emission during radiation therapy could be used to verify dose delivery in real-time if a more comprehensive quantitative understanding of the factors affecting emission intensity could be developed.

aimThis study aims to explore the change in diffuse Cherenkov emission intensity with x-ray beam energy from irradiated tissue, both theoretically and experimentally. APPROACH: Derivation of the emitted Cherenkov signal was achieved using diffusion theory, and experimental studies with 6 to 18 MV energy x-rays were performed in tissue phantoms to confirm the model predictions as related to the radiation build-up factor with depth into tissue.

resultsIrradiation at lower x-ray energies results in a greater surface dose and higher build-up slope, which results in a ∼46  %   greater diffusely emitted Cherenkov signal per unit dose at 6 MV relative to 18 MV x-rays. However, this phenomenon competes with a decrease in signal from less Cherenkov photons being generated at lower energies, a ∼44  %   reduction at 6 versus 18 MV. The result is an emitted Cherenkov signal that is nearly constant with beam energy.

conclusionsThis study explains why the observed Cherenkov emission from tissue is not a strong function of beam energy, despite the known strong correlation between Cherenkov intensity and particle energy in the absence of build-up and scattering effects.

Indexed as

PhotonsPhantoms, ImagingX-RaysCherenkovin-vivo dosimetrysurface dose

Identifiers

PMID34545714
PMCPMC8451315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.