Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34545533›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2021

Impact of the changes in the completion lymph node dissection criteria and approval of adjuvant therapies on the real-world outcomes of Japanese stage III melanoma patients.

Dai Ogata, Keiji Tanese, Yoshio Nakamura, Masaki Otsuka, Kenjiro Namikawa, Takeru Funakoshi, Syusuke Yoshikawa, Keita Tsutsui, Kenta Nakama, Shunichi Jinnai and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Current Surgical Management for Acral Melanoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current surgical management for melanoma.The Journal of dermatology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dai OgataDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. dogata@ncc.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-7100
Keiji TaneseDepartment of Dermatology, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Yoshio NakamuraDepartment of Dermatology, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Masaki OtsukaDepartment of Dermatology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Kenjiro NamikawaDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Takeru FunakoshiDepartment of Dermatology, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Syusuke YoshikawaDepartment of Dermatology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Keita TsutsuiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kenta NakamaDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Shunichi JinnaiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yoshio KiyoharaDepartment of Dermatology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Akira TakahashiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Naoya YamazakiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Keio University Hospital · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPNational Cancer Centre Japan · JP

Funding

National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 2020-J-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompletion lymph node dissection (CLND) has long been the standard treatment for stage III melanomas identified as metastasis on the sentinel node (SN-positive). Two major changes occurred in 2017 and 2018, the change in the CLND criteria for SN-positive patients and the approval of several adjuvant therapies could revolutionize such management approach. However, their effects have not been fully investigated on the real-world outcomes of stage III melanoma patients. Therefore, we investigated the impact of these changes on the prognosis of Japanese stage III melanoma patients.

methodsTotally, 119 stage III, SN-positive melanoma patients were included. They were categorized into those diagnosed as SN-positive between January 2015 and June 2017 (pre-June 2017 group) and between July 2017 and December 2019 (post-July 2017 group). Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival, and prognostic factors were analyzed.

resultsThe frequency of patients who received CLND was significantly higher in the pre-June 2017 group (p = 0.001), and those who received adjuvant therapy were significantly higher in the post-July 2017 group (p < 0.001). The 2-year RFS was 50.1% and 68.5% in the pre-June and post-July 2017 groups, respectively (p = 0.049). Cox proportional hazards model analysis for RFS showed that adjuvant therapies reduce the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.99; p = 0.047).

conclusionChanges in the CLND criteria in SN-positive patients and the approval of adjuvant therapies for stage III melanomas have significantly impacted Japanese melanoma medicine. Adjuvant therapy tended to prolong patient's RFS while omitting immediate CLND had no significant negative influence on it.

Indexed as

MelanomaSentinel Lymph NodeSkin NeoplasmsHumansJapanLymph Node ExcisionPrognosisSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdjuvant therapyLymph node dissectionMelanomaReal-world outcomeSentinel node

Identifiers

PMID34545533
OpenAlexW3200649468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.