ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2022
Pluripotent-derived Mesenchymal Stem/stromal Cells: an Overview of the Derivation Protocol Efficacies and the Differences Among the Derived Cells.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Embryonic lineage-specific iPSC-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells exhibit different morphologies and intrinsic functions.iScience · 2026Article
- Generation of canine induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells: Comparison of differentiation strategies and cell origins.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Review
- Narrative Review of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Renal Diseases: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions.Stem cells international · 2024Review
- Advancements and Innovative Strategies in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.Stem cells international · 2024Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Hope or a Hype?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are remarkable tools for regenerative medicine. Therapeutic approaches using these cells can promote increased activity and viability in several cell types through diverse mechanisms such as paracrine and immunomodulatory activities, contributing substantially to tissue regeneration and functional recovery. However, biological samples of human MSCs, usually obtained from adult tissues, often exhibit variable behavior during in vitro culture, especially with respect to cell population heterogeneity, replicative senescence, and consequent loss of functionality. Accordingly, it is necessary to establish standard protocols to generate high-quality, stable cell cultures, for example, by using pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) in derivation protocols of MSC-like cells since PSCs maintain their characteristics consistently during culture. However, the available protocols seem to generate distinct populations of PSC-derivedMSCs (PSC-MSCs) with peculiar attributes, which do not always resemble bona fide primary MSCs. The present review addresses the developmental basis behind some of these derivation protocols, exposing the differences among them and discussing the functional properties of PSC-MSCs, shedding light on elements that may help determine standard characterizations and criteria to evaluate and define these cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.